Assessing repeat biopsy

[vistacruiser]

I have been in a "watchful waiting" mode following a positive biopsy 18 months ago with results of two positive cores of 12 (4% and 22%), Gleason score 6.  Subsequent PSA tests(3)  have produced fluctuating levels(high 4.7/low 3.8). I am 76; health is otherwise good.  My next PSA is due in 2 weeks with urologist leaning toward repeating biopsy assumedly to compare results with the first.  Please first explain what your forum response to a biopsy question means in the context of my situation: "In fact, the yield of a positive biopsy for prostate cancer is less and less as each subsequent biopsy is performed." May I assume that if the core results are little different from my first biopsy, that this would indicate a relatively slow-growing tumor which I can continue to monitor with PSA tests and indicated biopsies?  What would your criteria be for a biopsy result that would suggest more serious consideration of active treatment?  Thank you.

[Ash Tewari, MD, M.Ch.]

Thank you for your question. I can imagine the anxiety you are facing with these repeat evaluations. You are a good candidate for expectant management with periodic PSAs, Digital rectal examinations, and biopsies is par for the course.

A repeat biopsy showing more than 2 cores positive and/or more than 50% cancer on any one core would be reason to seek out curative treatment either radiation or surgery.

Best of luck.

Ashutosh (Ash) K. Tewari, MD
www.cornellroboticprostate.org

This forum is for information only. The contents, such as graphics, images, text, quoted information and all other materials ("Content") are provided for reference only, do not claim to be complete or exhaustive or to be applicable to any particular individual's medical condition. Users should always consult with a qualified and licensed physician or other medical care provider. Users are warned to follow the advice of their physicians without delay regardless of anything read in this forum. The Weill Cornell Prostate Cancer Institute assumes no duty to correct or update the Content nor to resolve or clarify any inconsistent information which may be a part of the Content. Reliance on any Content is solely at the User's risk. This forum may contain health or medically related materials considered sexually explicit. Users are warned that if they may be offended by such Content, an alternate source of information should be found. Publication of information or reference in forum to specific sources such as specific products, procedures, physicians, treatments, or diagnoses are for information only and are not endorsements of the Weill Cornell Prostate Cancer Institute.