I'm trying to verify information I received from my urologist before I make the decision to have BNI.
In 2003 I underwent a radical prostatectomy for cancer. Early stage. All PSA tests negative for 5 years.
Two months after surgery I stopped urinating, caused by a stricture. It was opened using a balloon procedure.
This was followed by 1.5 years of intermittent self-catheterization (16 French coude tip), twice a day, to keep the urethra open--after which I stopped.
I had no problem urinating until 6 months ago when a "reverse" problem developed: periodic incontinence. It began after I moved extremely heavy objects and felt pain in my lower abdominal area. My general doctor said there were no external hernias upon examination. Then, a few dyas later, when I was resting in a recliner chair, I work up with a wet spot. For several evenings I "wet to bed."... But not every night. I suspected that I injured bladder muscles.
I noted what seemed to be a gradual low flow in my daily urination, so I saw a urologist. Knowing my previous problem with a struicture, he "opened" the urethra in his office using gradually larger sounds up to 18 French. When he cystiscoped me he commented that there was a flap of tissue blocking the urethra. I think this has been there for the 5 years since my prostatectomy, and questioned whether this was the new problem. At this point he recommended a BNI. After the opening procedure in his office, I have used 18 French catheters twice a day (LoFric hydrophilic).
For several weeks after the opening of the urethra my urination was "normal"---no incontinence nor low flow.
Now, even though I self-cath to keep the urethra stretched, I find I "leak" and have had (while sleeping) incontinence on some nights. The urologist still thinks that I need a BNI even though the problem is incontinence and not blockage.
My question: Why would a person have a BNI when the current problem is NOT low flow or blockage but rather periodic incontinence and wetting?
Thanks for any insights you can provide.
Dr. Robert Hill
University of Georgia
College of Education
You are correct that the bladder neck incision is used generally if the problem is obstruction. I do not wish to take away anything from your doctor, but the simplest (perhaps the silliest) explanation may be that he meant bladder neck sling (what do they call that, I think its “Presque vu”). A closer term would be a bladder neck suspension – but this is generally done in women.
It should be emphasized though, that not all incontinence is free of obstruction. There is an overflow incontinence, in which there is an obstruction and pressure gradually rises. Once sufficient pressure is present, the urine spills past the obstruction. In this scenario, the BNI may be helpful. Your urologist may suspect that the flap is acting as an obstruction.
It may be helpful to perform a urodynamic study, to settle the issue.
My best to you.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.