Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

gleason 9

Can someone have robotic surgery with a gleason score of 4+5=9 and a PSA of 10.66.  Its it better to eleminate the cancer than traditional surgery?
2 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
1089281 tn?1314567514
Dear Arnie: I was diagnosed with prostate cancer with  similiar numbers in 2005.  I had Proton Radiation for my treatment.  I personally would not consider any of the other type treatments if I could have Proton Radiation.  It has approximately a 90% cure rate and little to no side effects.  85 to 90% of the treatment energy is delivered at exactly the point being treated... thus surrounding tissues and organs are not damaged as with traditional radiation.  I was never sick or felt bad one single day during the time I had the treatments... well was not sick or felt bad after the treatments either.  My PSA is now .05 .  Its like I am cured and was never sick..Everything works just like it always hasand I dont wear a dipper..  I have -0- side effects as a result of the treatments.. Personally if one considers the side effects of most of the other treatments.... why have them when Proton treatments are available with no side effects and a 90 % cure rate... I had my treatments at Loma Linda University Medical Center in Loma Linda California...M D Anderson in Houston and 3-4 other hospitals are now doing Proton Radiation treatments... I would highly recommend Proton treatments.  If you would like any other info on Proton send me a message ...I will be glad to share my experience with you... Claytex
Helpful - 0
242579 tn?1252111171
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
Thank you for your question. Robotic prostatectomy is certainly possible for Gleason 9 patients. For a Gleason 9 patient, extended lymph node dissection would be done. A bone scan and a CT scan should be performed to rule out the possibility of lymph node metastasis. I have successfully performed scores of robotic procedures in patients with Biopsy Gleason 9.

Sincerely,

Ash K. Tewari, MD

www.nycrobotics.com

This forum is for information only. The contents, such as graphics, images, text, quoted information and all other materials ("Content") are provided for reference only, do not claim to be complete or exhaustive or to be applicable to any particular individual's medical condition. Users should always consult with a qualified and licensed physician or other medical care provider. Users are warned to follow the advice of their physicians without delay regardless of anything read in this forum. The Weill Cornell Prostate Cancer Institute assumes no duty to correct or update the Content nor to resolve or clarify any inconsistent information which may be a part of the Content. Reliance on any Content is solely at the User's risk. This forum may contain health or medically related materials considered sexually explicit. Users are warned that if they may be offended by such Content, an alternate source of information should be found. Publication of information or reference in forum to specific sources such as specific products, procedures, physicians, treatments, or diagnoses are for information only and are not endorsements of the Weill Cornell Prostate Cancer Institute.
Helpful - 0

You are reading content posted in the Prostate Cancer Forum

Popular Resources
A report from Missouri Medicine argues that, despite earlier media coverage, increased omega-3 fatty acid intake does not increase prostate cancer risk.
They got it all wrong: Why the PSA test is imperative for saving lives from prostate cancer
Get the facts about this disease that affects more than 240,000 men each year.
10 prostate cancer misconceptions debunked.
Diet and digestion have more to do with cancer prevention than you may realize
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.