This patient support community is for discussions relating to relationships, abstinence, arousal problems, birth control, cohabitation, commitment, communication, couples counseling, desire, sexual technique, and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).
I think if this works for him, that's great - although it's not necessarily working. I completely disagree with the 12 step program idea that you have to spill your guts to strangers, and admit to everyone all the stuff you've done. I don't think that's necessary, or helpful, for every kind of person.
Best wishes.
I advise letting this guy be alone for a while to work out his issues. Besides, why get involved with someone who has all these problems? You deserve better.
I've not been involved with anybody with addiction issues (I once dated a guy for about 3 weeks before realizing he was an alcoholic, at which point I bailed). However, I've seen how addictions in partners of my friends can be absolutely ruinous, not only to the relationship, but to the partner's self-esteem. Yeah, I know codependency "theory" has been debunked, but you can't help but recognize that folks who engage with those with serious addictions have some self-esteem issues going on that should probably be addressed.
I've come to believe that addictive personalities have huge narcissistic tendencies going on. Not to mention borderline traits. These are not people who can be satisfactory partners in relationship until the addiction is overcome.
I also believe that people with addictions not only need to overcome the addiction, they need to be "clean and sober" from whatever it is for perhaps many months before they can engage appropriately with partners.
The credit card thing alone would scare the pants off me. If you for whatever reason decide to stay with this guy and he miraculously makes some kind of comeback, get a pre-nup to protect yourself.
The guy's got some addictive tendencies, which he is working on with Buddhist meditation. He's still slipping here and there. At least he's moving in the right direction. Invest in your own karma by not kicking a man while he's down. Then, in the future, when you blow up and gain 80 pounds after a freak accident and get hooked on Vicadin, and are struggling to change but find setback after setback, maybe the universe will be kind and send you an equally patient and considerate soul.
I had a *serious* sex addiction and I overcame it, with a lot of help from my female partner, who offered support and encouragement rather than judgmentality and scorn. Fortunately I am married to a real woman, who knows how to stand by her man when things are tough. I stand by her through whatever she goes through -- and she has gone through a lot. That's how love and relationships are supposed to work. Women who tell you to dump someone because he has problems are either Stepford wives married to boring Stepford husbands, totally blind to crazy **** going on in their husbands' secret lives, or, most likely, NOT MARRIED!
J
What the f*ck is the Ricki Lake Show Syndrome? Sorry, "JohnnyV," but I don't have a T.V., and I assume you are referring to some kind of right-wing sensationalist talk show. Maybe you should stop watching the tube so much. Don't you have better ways to spend your time?
"Christ, folks, if you aren't willing to stick with someone through something difficult, then you don't belong in a relationship with *anyone.*"
She said the guy's lying. She said he's engaging in his addictions behind her back. Bottom line? She doesn't need that sh*t. I say leave. His addictive behavior and duplicitousness have apparently gone on even during his "therapy" with Buddhist meditation. You do the math.
"The guy's got some addictive tendencies, which he is working on with Buddhist meditation."
It doesn't appear to be working, though, does it, "JohnnyV?" He's still pulling the sh*t behind her back, hiding his behavior, and lying about it. He also apparently zones out during sex. How long would you put up with that? There's a reason why many experts recommend "cold-turkey" habit-kicking - because "dabbling" in the addiction doesn't move you even an inch down the road towards recovering. For many people, continued exposures to the addictive behavior, even if they are small, like "just one drink on the weekends," or whatever, do nothing to help in extinguishing the behavior. Actually, that sounds like what we have in this case.
" He's still slipping here and there. At least he's moving in the right direction."
No. He's engaging in his behaviors while also engaging in his so-called therapeutic modality of "meditation." He's gaming himself and his partner with this technique. Nothing new here. This is quite common for addicts of all stripes. Repeated exposures like this tend to feed the denial of the addict that they are "moving towards recovery." Staying in denial doesn't move you further towards kicking the habit. It's an endless cycle.
"Invest in your own karma by not kicking a man while he's down."
I'm sorry, I wasn't in line while they were passing out the new-age fairy dust. What does this mean again? Some of us don't buy into magical thinking.
"Then, in the future, when you blow up and gain 80 pounds after a freak accident and get hooked on Vicadin (sic), and are struggling to change but find setback after setback, maybe the universe will be kind and send you an equally patient and considerate soul."
We have to take responsiblity for our behavior, and if we are in relationships, we damn well better do our best not to hurt our partners. Nobody said life was fair, or easy. Setbacks happen. But we are talking about physical and psychological addictions here. I have to stand by my post that these types of behavior disorders need the full attention of the person with the addiction in order to be overcome. It's not easy. Nobody said it was. If an alcoholic finds "setback after setback" in trying to kick his habit, meaning that his partner and the relationship end up severely damaged because of that, should the partner stick around? I don't think that has much to do with the "universe" sending us a "patient and considerate soul." That has to do with a person who is so out of control of his impulsive behavior because of an addiction that his behavior then negatively impacts everybody around him. There is nothing new-agey about that.
If somebody is checked out of reality to the point that they are drunk or high on Vicodin much of the time or has out of control spending habits that are going to take me down with him, or, at the very least, cause me considerable emotional turmoil, I'll leave.
"I had a *serious* sex addiction and I overcame it, with a lot of help from my female partner, who offered support and encouragement rather than judgmentality and scorn. Fortunately I am married to a real woman, who knows how to stand by her man when things are tough."
Okay, you can stop with the "real woman" sh*t. You're dating yourself - like back to the 1900s. We can do without it, frankly. Good for your partner. She does not represent all women, so you can't judge what others might do if confronted with the same problem. Also, your remarks reed of sexism, so knock it off. It's unbecoming, to say the least.
"That's how love and relationships are supposed to work. Women who tell you to dump someone because he has problems are either Stepford wives married to boring Stepford husbands, totally blind to crazy **** going on in their husbands' secret lives, or, most likely, NOT MARRIED!"
More assumptions because it deviates from your world-view. That's a pretty narrow viewpoint, "JohnnyV." Here's how "love and relationships" work to me, in a nutshell: I respect my partner, I love him, I want as much for him as I want for myself. If he begins engaging in behavior that is harmful to me, or to the relationship, and that behavior doesn't change, after discussion, perhaps after some therapy, or with him finding his own techniques ("Buddhist meditation") to figure out how to combat his problem, I'm gone.
What you are essentially describing is unconditional love. Sorry, but unconditional love should be restricted to children and pets. Unconditional love has no place when we are discussing rational, responsible, emotionally healthy adults in relationships. My partner doesn't deserve my "unconditional" love. He has to earn my love, through his behavior, through his actions. And I have to earn his - through my behavior and through my actions. And if he continues to engage in hurtful behaviors - harmful to me, harmful to my relationship with him - and those behaviors can't be worked through to the satisfaction of BOTH partners, the relationship won't work.
The condition being described here, though is none of these. From what I can gather from the OP's comments, her partner is not really willing to change to the point of giving up the addiction, but rather just modifying his behavior enough to keep her.
Forgiveness, compassion, and loyalty (trust) must be earned by consistent behavior that shows that he is willing to protect the relationship. It does not sound like he has reached the point of being willing to really change (e.g., "rock bottom).
I am not doubting the fact that he loves her but the behavior shows that he does not put the relationship above his need for a "fix". Therefore, the addiction continues to run his life. She has stated that he is not even "present" during making love. This along with the debt issues would be enough to worry me.
As far as the other comments you made about the stepford wives and NOT MARRIED, you are letting your emotions govern your thoughts to the point of being downright prejudicial towards women.
Your situation is great that you were able to overcome and she was able to stand by your side. However, you showed changes to make her be willing to stay and work with you. It does not sound like that is truly the case here.
Addictions are not something you can "solve" for your partner. They overtake the life of the person engaged in them, and they are ruinous for spouses and family members. If your partner tries over and over again to kick his or her habit, and continues to fail, how long do you expect any intelligent and emotionally healthy person to hang on? Why should you let your partner take you down with them?
Your opinion about divorce rates isn't relevant to this discussion.