Back in Sept. my cardioligist sent me for a Calcium Scoring. The radiologist noticed something on the lung. My doctor sent me for a PET scan and here is the finding.
"Scattered bilateral foci are detected in both lung fields. This uptake corresponds to opacities on CT scan. The dominant focus demonstrates a max SUV 3.9 and corresponds to an opacity within the right upper lobe. The radiotracer distribution throughout the remainder of the visualized structures in unremarkable. There are no
focalFocal neurological deficits areas of abnormal increased FDG uptake to suggest the presence of a distant metabolically active process."
"Bilateral lung opacities are metabolically active.
InflammatoryInflammatory bowel disease
Ulcerative colitis processes and neoplastic disease are both diagnostic considerations. Tissue sampling may be of additional benefit."
After this report, I went to a Pulmonologist who sent me for a CT scan of Thorax. After reviewing the CT he sent me to a Lung Surgeon who determined a biopsy (arthroscopic) was needed.
I notice that in many other questions people are waiting six months and repeating the CT scan. There has been no change since Sept. I was told by all Dr's that they belive the nodule is
benignBenign ear cyst or tumor
Benign positional vertigo. Why wouldn't the Drs hold off on the biopsy and redo CT scan in 6 months and address the inflammation now? I am a 54 yr old
femaleCondoms
Female condoms
Female sexual dysfunction in good health and haven't smoked in 30 yrs although I am subjected in 2nd
handHand or foot spasms
Hand tremor smoke.