I had spirometry done in Feb 2010 on my own request, as I had been getting very short of breath when exercising strenuously - Dr thought i had anxiety.
They results were 'normal' - or more specifically a lung age of 33, (I was 31) which they said was fine.
I had another test done march 2011, again, my request to see if there was a difference, as i was getting short of breath for no reason sometimes (it came and went) - Dr said anxiety, and that i was too young for copd.
I insisted, and the result was a lung age of 39 - and the dr told me he thought i had copd.
I have since had a 3rd one done by a private respiratory specialist for a 2nd opinion, and again got 'normal results' but still lung age of 39. He also did a chest xray. He said I dont have copd, and even with lung age of 39, he said the numbers were still well within those acceptable as normal, and that i should pack up smoking.
However, I have smoked since i can remember - approx age 11 or 12, and dont understand, and nor does the respiratory specialist I have just seen, why i would have done little/no damage up to feb 2010 (19-20 years of smoking) and then in one year taken a sudden rise in lung age. The only thing different from a year ago is i have stopped my regular strenuous exercise - could that really make that much difference?
The specialist has advised I take peak flow meter readings every day for a few weeks (been doing for a couple of days now and getting 650 every time) and stop the smoking.
I have since stopped the cigs, just in case - but would like to know if anyone has any ideas?
My latest results were at age 32, 185cm tall, male, FEV1 4.53 and FVC 5.18 = lung age 39 (a year ago they were fev1 4.59 and fvc 5.01 lung age 33)
Thanks in advance for your ideas!