In general lifelong non-smokers are much less likely than smokers or ex-smokers to develop lung cancer - if that is what you are worried about. And lung cancer is more
commonCommon cold when you are older. However, a chest CT scan may be very helpful to further assess the
natureNature-throid
Natures tears of the nodular densities seen on your chest x-ray. It is the appropriate next test. If your breathing trouble persists, you might also consider having spirometry. This is a simple breathing test that measures how your lungs are working.
I too had a horrific lung infection in January and February that was categorized as walking pneumonia at that time. After the CT scan results, I went to a pulmonolgist who tested me for coccidioidomycosis and the test was positive for the IgG antibody and a comp fixation of 1:4. Coccidioidomycosis (aka Valley Fever) comes from a fungal spore prevalent in the Southwest U.S. and I had visited there 2 times last year. Apparently, the coccidioidomycosis can produce lung nodules that mimic lung cancer nodules. There are a significant number of documented cases where this has occurred. Tourists are most susceptible to infections because residents tend to develop immunities. In the Midwest, there is also a fungus that can cause Histoplasmosis with similar symptoms.
I had a biopsy of the larger nodule, but the results were “inconclusive”. Because I smoked (and no longer do), the doctors still suspected malignancy and so I recently had a PET scan for the 2 nodules that were found on my CT. My PET came back cold and I am very grateful for that.
I know you must be worrying about this. When I was waiting for test results, I spent a lot of time trying to educate myself as much as I could with all the resources the Internet has to offer. I also changed my diet, began drinking tons of water, and taking a regimen of vitamins. Exercise helped me keep my mind off it. And I began praying a lot more. I believe God answered those prayers.
I wish you all the best and I hope you keep us posted.
God bless,
Tom
Tom
Do you need to go back every 3 months for 2 years for repeat ct scans?
My frightening ordeal began last November. I had an abdominal ct scan done for a slight, persistant pain on my right side. The ct found nothing there, but clipped the bottom of my lungs and found a 5mm lung nodule in the lower left lung.
I went to a pulmonary specialist after doing research on the internet. He had me go back for a full chest ct scan 2 weeks later which revealed the nodule was 9mm and another nodule was found in the opposite lung (4mm).
I was told to repeat scan in 3 months. In Feb, I went to another specialist because I was going crazy and wanted an immediate answer. I went to an oncologist who took a zillion blood tests and arranged for a pet ct of my entire body. The pet scan came back pet negative and in this scan, the left nodule measured in at 6mm. The right nodule could not be found in this scan.
It became clear to me that each scan apparently is different and that I am getting no where closer to an answer. All this information is confusing beyond belief. To make matters worse, I went to yet another doctor who told me to stop all the ct scanning because I will kill myself from the radiation exposure. (had 3 ct scans in 4 months time) and now month 6, the polmonary doctor wants me to scan again.
I am to the point where I want to say "enough is enough" and just have a chest x-ray in 4 or 5 months to see if it grows. I am very dissapointed with the medical care I have been given and the lack of knowledge these professionals have. No wonder lung cancer is the leading killer of all cancers.
worrywart2
Tom
I guess what bugs me the most is the different sizes I keep hearing with each new scan. When I told this to the pulmonologist, he said that each one is different...if this is the case, how do you ever really know if it's growing and so what's the point? I thought they would do a match each time to the original but doesn't look like it. Seems they are not comparing precisely because you can't measure it precisely each time? Is this hit and miss if you get the same angle each time?
I'm losing confidence in the entire process.
I have read (and was told) that nodules a cm or greater with a negative pet scan have a 95% chance of being benign. Were you told this by your radiologist?
My nodules are under a cm so the negative pet scan is really not conclusive in my case, but I would think it should be in your case.
After seeing my pulmonologist last week, he decided I should wait until August for another scan. If that one shows no growth, I will have another in 6 months. I think when I brought to his attention that I have already had 3 within 6 months, he changed his mind about my having another so soon. The radiation risk I think is real.