By the accepted criteria, 3 millimeter (mm) and 4 mm nodules are very small. It is not
correctCorrect (new formula) that 40% of nodules are
malignantCancer
Gestational trophoblastic disease
Lymphoma, malignant - ct scan
Malignant melanoma
Malignant otitis externa
Melanoma of the eye
Multiple myeloma
Skin cancer, malignant melanoma. In fact it is inappropriate to group all nodules together to make such a statement. There are well-established criteria for establishing the likelihood that a nodule is or isn’t
malignantCancer
Gestational trophoblastic disease
Lymphoma, malignant - ct scan
Malignant melanoma
Malignant otitis externa
Melanoma of the eye
Multiple myeloma
Skin cancer, malignant melanoma. You should ask your doctor or the radiologist about this. A nodule is less likely to be
malignantCancer
Gestational trophoblastic disease
Lymphoma, malignant - ct scan
Malignant melanoma
Malignant otitis externa
Melanoma of the eye
Multiple myeloma
Skin cancer, malignant melanoma when it is:
· less than 2 centimeters (cm) or 20 mm in size;
· smooth, regular edges, and
· calcified.
Assuming that you are in apparently good health, the odds are very much in your favor that these nodules are not malignant.
However, a chest CT scan is generally not part of "a general workup". The reason that the CT scan was done might also need to be taken into consideration in assessing these nodules.
Your doctor's recommendation of re-examination in 6 months is reasonable. In the meantime, you should try to locate all chest x-rays that have been taken in the past. Given their size, these nodules might not have shown up on a chest x-ray, even if they were present in the past. However, it would be very reassuring that the nodules are not malignant if they are seen on a chest x-ray from 2 years ago or longer.
good luck
3 months ago I had a 4mm nodule in the right lower lobe and a 3mm nodule in the left lower lobe. Now these are 5mm and 4mm, respectively. The description of the 5mm nodule is puzzling: "it is unchanged in appearance and size when compared with the previous study"; however, in the preceding study it was 4mm and now it's 5mm. Also, its appearance is now said to be "suggestive of a small arteriovenous malformation" (this is new, there wasn't this description three months ago).
There are also three small nodules that weren't noticed on the prior scan: 1) a 3mm nodule just caudal and anterior to the 5mm nodule; 2) a 2mm nodule in the left lower lobe, and 3) a 2mm nodule in the lingula. The radiologist wrote that both 2mm nodules were present on the previous study (although they weren't mentioned until now). Nothing was said about the 3 mm nodule, but my dr. subsequently viewed the images together with the radiologist and now they say the 3mm nodule was there three months ago too.
In addition, they found a 3mm "ovoid low-density lesion in the posterior segment of the right lobe of the liver which was not definitely seen on the prior study. It is too small to characterize."
My dr. says that he's not worried, but I don't find him convincing. He says that there can be fluctuations between one reading and another, that the increase in size could be due to the CT being done at a slightly different angle or something like that. Same for the appearance of the new nodules and the liver lesion.
He says in any case all these things are too small to biopsy and all I can do is wait and rescan in 3 or 6 months. He didn't respond directly to my questions about what would be the likelihood that this is cancer. I am very worried.
So, if anyone has any knowledge about these areas, please tell me what you think about what this all might mean, whether I should be worried, and whether there are other tests or avenues I should pursue at this time.
God bless and thank you for your help.
I was 32 years old and diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in multiple colon polyps. They were rather large and deep when they found them. My local community hospital felt it was safe to say the cancer in the polyps was "likely" contained and had not spread. Likely?? I didn't feel comfortable with that. I went to the hospital's pathology lab and requested my slides. I then took a train into New York City, went to Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and hand-delivered my slides and my chart to one of the most prominent doctors for this problem in the country to review. Was it overkill? Possibly. But I certainly felt much better after I had his opinion.
So, all of this to say, if you are concerned and confused (and rightly should be with the new findings that were "missed" at each CT), I would research the best medical center in your geographical area for cancer. Get ALL of your CT scans, PET scans and x-rays (the films, not just the reports), your entire chart from your physician and have an expert review all of it. Your piece of mind is worth it! Telling you not to worry is insulting, especially with the conflicting information being provided to you. If the expert comes up with the same conclusion, just to continue serial CTs, you'll still feel better about it. Good luck.
Numerous small well circumscribed nodules 5mm or less in diameter are scattered throughout both lungs. Two of the nodules were present on 11/1/2005 and 1/10/2006 and are unchanged. However, the vast majority of these nodules have developed de novo and the appearance is consistent with metastasis disease. The lungs show no infiltrates. The heart is normal in size. The aorta and pulmonary arteries are normal. There is no adenopathy and there are no chest wall abnormalities. The gallbladder is surgically absent.
Conclusion: Numerous small nodules 5 mm or less have developed throughout both lungs since 1/10/2006 and the appearances of consistent with metastic disease.
long story short, he had two stints placed in his lad in march of 2006. His shortness of breath did not improve, however he has passed the pulmonary functions test(sitting down blowing in a machine) In february the doctors noticed several nodules in his lungs. Follow up ct scans were ordered with the last in November.
The nodules increased in size but in November his doctor blew it off stating that a lot of people have nodules that they don't even know about. Thus no more follow up has been scheduled. I feel helpless knowing his history of cancer, the high doses of radiation and the exposure to agent orange. any advice would be greatly appreciated. Did I mention that his doctors were through the Veterans Administration!!!!
My father died of Lung Cancer 2 years ago. He was a smoker. I am getting some more CT's done. The Dr. told me that there is a genetic disease where a person can have a deficency and be suseptable to lung diseases. Has anyone ever heard of this. Thanks.