Yeah, Vance and I, knew that was your concern from the begining. That's why you were asked to re-read what he said. It is small matters. Wheather people believe us or not that's up to them.
"Razor burn is meaningless". So yes Razor burn is meaningless from the encounter. That you shouldn't worry. If your thinking the fluids could leakin to that razor burn and thus infect you, well it doesn't work that way. You have to be bleeding excessively and there has to be alot of rubing and grinding of the fluids against an open cut, --there wasn't; your razor burn IS meanlingless.
You had to have a active fresh (like 1 mintue fresh) razor cut on your unprotected penis and be having unprotected insertive sex (which will supply the grinding and rubing of the pathorgen into the cut) to get a blood-bone STD. AAANND the person has to be infected.
So, congrats on using a condom.
But, the fluids dripped to the lower part of my shaft and pubic area (both with razor burn). That (fluid on razor burn) is what I am worried about.
Re-read what vance told you about razon burns, and skin-skin transmission.
Its low risk for them.
Fluids can transmit most STDS (chlamydia, gon, syphilis, trich,) but you were protected, so I wouldn't worry from your encounter. So there is no need to worry.
And what diseases can the fluids transmit?
And the rate of skin-skin transmission is still low? I have read that is is extremly common?
Doesn't razor burn imply micro cuts?
Razor burn is meaningless...skin to skin runs a small risk of herpes, HPV, syphilis. But as I said most people don't have sex with an active outbreak.
Well. I had razor burn (possibly microcuts) and the juices did get on the area where the pubic hair used to be and on the very low en of the shaft. IWhat kind of risk is there for that contact?
You really had no risk from protected sex. Yes HPV and HSV have very very low risks and if you noticed no bumps then really no risk. Most people would not have sex with an active breakout.
There is no test for HPV in men.