In theory, there probably is some potential risk of your catching HSV of your finger. But it is too low to measure or to worry about. In 35 years in the STD business, I have never seen or even heard of such a case. If you develop soreness or blister-like lesions around the area of the cut in the next couple of weeks, see a health care provider. But almost certainly it won't happen. If it doesn't, just forget this whole episode.
Good luck-- HHH, MD
Herpetic whitlow is just the official name for when you get herpes on the fingers/hands which is what HHH was talking about when he answered your question.
If this gal didn't have any active symptoms your risk was pretty low. Even lower yet if she's on daily suppressive therapy. Do you know if she has hsv1 or hsv2 genitally? Have you ever had a herpes blood test yourself to know your own status?
grace
Unless I developed symptoms on my finger, I would just move on.
Even if you get Herpes Whitlow from HSV-2 (herpes on your finger) you wouldn't have it genitally. In that case you would test positive for HSV-2
via a serological test, but you still wouldn't have genital herpes.
I think serological testing "just to know your status" is a bad idea.
The following is from the US Department of Health & Human Services
so I think I can just post it. But for those interested you can go to
http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm and check it out for yourself.
•The USPSTF recommends against routine serological screening for HSV in asymptomatic adolescents and adults.
Rating: D Recommendation.
Rationale: The USPSTF found no evidence that screening asymptomatic adolescents and adults with serological tests for HSV antibody improves health outcomes or symptoms or reduces transmission of disease. There is good evidence that serological screening tests can accurately identify those persons who have been exposed to HSV. There is good evidence that antiviral therapy improves health outcomes in symptomatic persons (e.g., those with multiple recurrences); however, there is no evidence that the use of antiviral therapy improves health outcomes in those with asymptomatic infection. The potential harms of screening include false-positive test results, labeling, and anxiety, although there is limited evidence of any potential harms of either screening or treatment. The USPSTF determined the benefits of screening are minimal, at best, and the potential harms outweigh the potential benefits.
There are a lot of people walking around thinking they have herpes because
of false positives. If you do test, I would strongly recommend a confirming
test if you come up positive.
Now my stool has become soft and I have mild constipation. Would these be symptoms of herpes? If so,w ould they occur before the outbreak?
Thanks so much!
This thread is over.