HerpeSelect is no more confusing and no more unreliable than many serological (antibody) tests, and less so than some. It is a biological fact that measuring and interpreting antibody tests is a complex business, especially for HSV. (It is no accident that it took more than 15 years for the diagnostic industry to come up with accurate HSV antibody tests that didn't cost $150 or more.) HerpeSelect isn't
perfectPerfect choice, but it is light years better than the situation before type-specific tests became available and widely used in the past 2-3 years. Anyway, the manufacturer (Focus Technologies) did not design the test for patients, nor does it intend for patients to be given the numerical results. In theory, the provider receives the numerical results then
simplySimply sleep tells the patient positive, negative, or (in come cases) something like "equivocal, consider retesting". Admittedly this can be a problem when the provider him/herself doesn't really understand the test, but that's not the manufacturer's fault.
1) I cannot tell why the lab is doing additional testing, but it may be a good sign. Perhaps they recognized an equivocal result and are doing additional testing. The result you actually receive may be more
reliableReliable gentle laxative than otherwise; I see no reason to suspect it means the result will be positive.
2) Possibly yes. My understanding is that the company did not provide credit to laboratories that had already purchased supplies of the earlier test. Therefore, most labs probably will go through their current supplies and will get the new test next time they put in an order to the company or to a wholesale supplier.
3) Yes, that is possible; a few infected people never develop a strongly positive result. But based on the results so far, it is more likely you are not infected with HSV-2. Perhaps the pending result will sort things out. If not, consider asking the lab to refer your specimen to Focus for additional testing, perhaps at no cost (which I suspect I suggested in your earlier thread, although I didn't go back to look); or to a reference lab for Western blot.
HHH, MD
the Herpes Select Test is a valuable diagnositic tool.
For example, if a patient reports symptoms consistent of Herpes
complaining of sores which are healing. It may be too late for
a "swab". Perhaps a pregnant woman reports a history of sores
but has no symptoms. In these examples, the Herpes Select would
be invaluable to a physician.
But in my opinion, the problem arises when Clinics and STD Websites agressively market this test to the general public using what can only be discribed as "scare tactics" while failing to fully inform the public as to its limitations. It even gets worse with the marketing of IGM results as indicative of "recent exposure" which of course "hooks" the patient into repeated testing at sigificant costs.
Your third HSV-2 result of 1.13 (I think it was) simply indicates your antibody pattern is durable. The interpretation does not change; as I repeatedly told you, the most likely explanation is that you are not infected with HSV-2. I also told you how to resolve it (communicate with Focus about possible confirmatory testing at no cost, or Western blot). Do not rely on Biokit to answer the question. A negative Biokit result would tend to confirm that you don't have HSV-2, but a positive result--which is possible--will just be confusing; you'll still need the confirmatory testing already discussed.
This is my last response.
HHH, MD
So as things stand now, it may the the fastest with the least hassle and least expensive option in the long run. From your previous posts, I assume you know how to make it happen.
Best Wishes!!!!
you can order a Western Blot on line. They have a network
of labs who will do the blood draw and make it happen.
It's true that many health care providers won't do it for
what ever the reason.
I've been throught the herpes testing "merry go round"
myself so I know what you're going through.
From your background I doubt you have HSV2. In rare
cases, Herpes Whitlow, etc., there are ways of getting HSV2
without intercourse. An HSV2 antibody test cannot tell
you where the sight is infection is. It's just assumed
its genital because it would be very rare for it to be
otherwise.
But I think there's something wrong with the positive tests. You may think they're using a Herpes Select, but some labs don't for economic reasons. Had that experience too.
No doubt a Western Blot would be definitive, so you're on
the right tract.
Can you tell us why you were orginally tested for HSV2?
Best Wishes!!!!
But I think you will find you don't have herpes.
I wouldn't believe everthing I read on the net especially
about "bumps" or "pimples" being herpes. If everyone who had bumps or pimples charged down and got tested for Herpes, it would overwhelm the health care system. Herpes symptoms
are ulcerated sores (blisters).
Good Luck and God Bless!!!!