Well, once there gone visibally, won't you basically guarantee infecting you spouse (given enough time), even there are no symptoms?
Subclinical HPV is believed to clear up just as rapidly as symtomatic infection. Even without treatment, asymptomatic infection with the wart-causing HPV types (mostly HPV 6 and 11) generally is gone in 6-12 months.
Thanks for the quick reply.
I'm concerned about transmissability because the guy that infected me never showed any visible symptoms, but after I was infected I had warts appear.
If I understand correctly, for people who do have visible GWs, once they clear up, and stay gone, the transmission risk is lowered.
But what about for the subclinical carriers of the virus? does their transmission risk taper off or stay high always?
Unfortunately, vestibular papillae are not an STD, which is the only focus of this forum; and I'm not a gynecologist and really don't know much about them. Although they can be confused with warts by untrained observers, that's undoubtedly not a problem for a gynecologist.
1) So I cannot answer question 1, except to confirm it's not a manifestation of HPV or warts. You should just ask your gynecologist for much more accurate information than I can offer.
2) In general, warts usually are not transmissible once the warts themselves have been resolved and there has been no visible recurrence after a few months. Six months is probably about right.
4) You don't say how long you and your boyfriend have been together. If you were sexually active during the time you had warts, you can assume he already has been infected, regardless of whether he ever had visible warts. If he is a new partner since your warts were treated, he might be susceptible--but on the other hand, you probably aren't still infected yourself. Either way, most likely there is no problem. Further, if he gets immunized with Gardasil, he won't be protected until a month or so after the second dose, i.e. not until 2 months after starting--and not fully protected until after the 3rd dose in 6 months. And as you say, since it's still off-label for men, it would cost at least $500. So bottom line is that it's up to you, but to me it doesn't seem worth the hassle. What's the worst that happens? He gets warts, gets treated, then doesn't have to worry about it--at least not if he doesn't have a new partner who he might infect.
Good luck-- HHH, MD