This forum is patient support community for questions discussing
Birth Control, Fetishes, Foreplay, Intimacy, Masturbation, Orgasms, Partners and Relationships, Pornography, Positive and Negative Sexual Experiences, Virginity, Safe Sex, Sexual Orientation, Sexual Surrogates, Sexual Positions, stimulation, and toys.
This forum is not for STD or HIV related questions. For these questions, please visit our
STD or
HIV forums.
Those who support circumcision claim that it is healthier. There is an increased chance of penile cancer in guys who are not circumcised (although it's fairly rare). Recent studies claim that the incidence of HIV transmission is increased in guys who aren't circumcised because the virus can become trapped under the foreskin and remain there for some time. Finally, they say that circumcised guys can "perform" longer due to the slight decrease in sensitivity.
The problem is, no one can really verify the sensitivity claim on either side of the argument. Those of us who wre circumcised in infancy have no way of telling whether the sensitivity decreased over the years. Guys who are circumcised as adults are not "toughened up" and have no way of knowing the difference either.
The bottom line is, unless you have a condition where you cannot fully retract the foreskin (called phimosis) there's really no reason for it. As long as your partner has no preference and you're satisfied the way you are - why bother?
Enter www.circlist.com, the best world site about circumcision; there you will have all information you need. And please, do a "low & tight" circumcision, the best type, taking off all internal skin and suturing the external skin just behind the glans.
Be happy.
Bill