Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Question re: mole removal following atypical mole biopsy result
by worried1215, Jun 18, 2009 10:02PM
Hi Doctor,
My boyfriend just got the results of a mole biopsy that state:
"Compound melanocytic nevus with architectural disorder and mild cytological atypia (dysplastic nevus) involving a lateral biopsy margin."
The dermatologist recommended that he get the mole removed. Questions:
1. As far as we understand, this just means the mole is mildly atypical, right? Is it necessary to remove it?
2. The dermatologist also stated that he generally recommends that moles be removed within a month of the biopsy. Given the biopsy result, is it necessary to remove the mole immediately or would it be OK to wait for a few months (till November/December)? The reason I am asking is that my boyfriend is very physically active in the summer time, and because of the mole's location, he was told he'd need to stop exercising for over a month after the mole removal. Is there any risk of the mole turning into melanoma in the near future? If so, he would go ahead and have it removed right away.
Thank you very much for all your help!
My boyfriend just got the results of a mole biopsy that state:
"Compound melanocytic nevus with architectural disorder and mild cytological atypia (dysplastic nevus) involving a lateral biopsy margin."
The dermatologist recommended that he get the mole removed. Questions:
1. As far as we understand, this just means the mole is mildly atypical, right? Is it necessary to remove it?
2. The dermatologist also stated that he generally recommends that moles be removed within a month of the biopsy. Given the biopsy result, is it necessary to remove the mole immediately or would it be OK to wait for a few months (till November/December)? The reason I am asking is that my boyfriend is very physically active in the summer time, and because of the mole's location, he was told he'd need to stop exercising for over a month after the mole removal. Is there any risk of the mole turning into melanoma in the near future? If so, he would go ahead and have it removed right away.
Thank you very much for all your help!
Post Comment
Related Communities
Recent Videos
Related Expert Forums
Recent Activity
Most Popular Trackers
RSS
Expert Activity
Community Members
Most Viewed Health Pages
Popular Groups
