This patient support community is for discussions relating to stroke, rehabilitation, ability to eat/swallow, alertness, bowel/bladder control, depression, motor skills, nutrition, orthotics/braces, pain, prevention, senses, and spasticity.
Our mother/grandmother had a massive stroke on the right side of her brain, 2 weeks ago today. This happened after having been taken off of coumadin, for a 24 year old mechanical heart valve, during a bypass surgery. Following the surgery, her doctors, thinking she had a biological valve, kept her off the coumadin due to an increased risk of GI bleeding.
To prevent a second stroke, and to accelerate her recovery, we've tried explaining to her doctors that she has a mechanical valve. But for 2 weeks, they have insisted that she has a pig valve. Finally, we've been able to hunt down sufficient evidence that she has a mechanical valve, and the doctors have acknowledged they made a mistake. But now the doctors are saying that they still don't want to put her on coumadin, due to the recent problem with GI bleeding during the bypass surgery. The doctors are calling this a history of GI bleeding, though she has never had a bleeding problem in her life.
Everything I've read from academic journals stresses the importance of being put back on anticoagulants within a week after stroke. This is supposedly necessary to sustain recovery, and we are worried that her slow (though steady) recovery is due to a lack of blood flow to the brain; this obviously raises the fear that she will have a second stroke.
How long would it be appropriate to wait to be put back on coumadin, given a mechanical heart valve, and a single incidence of bleeding?
Is the stroke ischemic or hemorrhagic? Therapy with Coumadin is a balance between bleeding and clotting. All the pros and cons need to be weighed, if the blood is too thin at present, it will further aggravate the bleeding episodes. It’s unfortunate that after 24 yrs, withdrawal of Coumadin has triggered an episode of stroke. Right now the progress with Coumadin has to be based on the INR status. Patients on warfarin should have an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 for basic "blood-thinning" needs. For some who have a high risk of clot formation, the INR needs to be higher - about 2.5 to 3.5. Only monitoring can help decide when she needs Coumadin therapy.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.