Hi there,
I have secondary
hyperparathyroidismHyperparathyroidism
Primary hyperparathyroidism
Secondary hyperparathyroidism due to
RENALAcute kidney failure
Addison’s disease
Adrenal gland biopsy
Adrenalectomy
Cancer - renal pelvis or ureter
Catecholamines - blood
Chronic renal failure
Dialysis
End-stage kidney disease
Kidney diet - dialysis patients
Kidney stones bone disease. The pathology test for: 25 HYDROXY VITAMIN D, reported a good reading,however the
PTH test is elevated outside the range-5 times, why would a kidney specialist want to consider Vitamin D therapy,
Rocaltrol(
calcitriolCalcitriol
Calcitriol topical), the drug used here in Australia? What I am really concerned about is that Vitamin D therapy has the potential to elevate the
creatinineCreatinine clearance levels and can it not jeopordise my ceatinine levels which ARE elevated , nevertheless stable,to a level where it is TOO HIGH and then cause a situation where I would PREMATURELY have to commence Dialysis???. The whole objective is to defer Dialysis, and be treated conservatively. The PTH which was outside the range two-fold, 9 months ago, was not brought to my attention, nor did the specialist make mention of Vitamin D therapy, when at that time, the creatinine level was lower.Also,because there is a direct correlation between Calcium and the Parathyroid Hormone,(also bearing in mind that the pathology referral paper was marked URGENT),the pathology test was conducted and collected at the SAME TIME, however, the calcium test was reported 3 hours after collection, BUT the plasma parathyroid test was ONLY reported 3 DAYS later. Is there a possibility that because the 2 tests were reported on different days, that perhaps the reading is WRONG, and it would be worthwhile to REPEAT the test and stress to the lab. that the tests(both calcium and plasma parathyroid hormone)be reported TOGETHER?
Thanks
KATDEN