We have decided to follow the urologist's advice and perform a hydrocelectomy on my 14th month old son in the next couple of weeks. His right side has hydrocele, his left side currently does not.
The urologist said that although his left side is currently fine, he usually operates on both sides regardless. It has been his experience that up to 50% of his patients who only do one side return within 2 years needing surgery on the other side. We have to tell him our preference by the end of the week.
However, some internet research indicates studies with rates of only 7-10% of the other side flaring up later, and one study in particular recommends against doing bilateral surgery if only one side evidences hydrocele.
The pro of doing both sides is not having to worry about it again---no repeat surgery. The cons of both sides are 1) longer exposure to anesthesia and 2) if there is a surgical problem,
completeComplete
Complete a-z
Complete allergy
Complete natal
Complete premium
Complete senior
Complete-rf infertilityInfertility
Infertility - resources
Primary infertility may result (and may not be discovered for many years).
I do not want to have to go through another surgery for him, but I also do not want to do anything medically unnecessary now and risk the cons.
What is the currently accepted thinking on this? Is bilateral surgery recommended even if only one side evidences hydrocele? Statistics? Thoughts on the realities of the pros and cons that I mentioned?
Thank you.