Dear J,
It is difficult to assess your situation, since only a routine X-ray was performed. An IVP with dye would be more appropriate. It would settle the issue of a stone vs phlebolith (calcified vessel), complete obstruction vs partial , hydronephrosis, the function of the affected kidney, and possibly show the angle of implantation of the ureter. There are several ways to reimplant the ureter in an antireflux fashion, and a cross Cohen procedure would pose a substantial problem if a stone is identified at the junction of the ureter and the bladder and you had a significant obstruction.
In this position in the pelvis, you would not be a candidate for Shock Wave Lithotripsy because the surrounding bony structure of the pelvis doesn't allow the shock waves to penetrate. A standard retrograde procedure would also be difficult, do to the angle of the ureter in the bladder wall. Depending on the size of a stone, it would still have a chance to pass, and a brisk diuresis from drinking fluids may help. As long as you are able to tolerate the pain, you remain infection free, and your kidney is not completely obstructed, a trial to pass the stone in a spontaneous fashion is acceptable. Even though, most ureteral reimplants are narrow and decrease to chances of stone passage I have seen success. However, if you are clinically in pain or in danger of renal function loss, either an antegrade procedure or open stone removal may become necessary.
Find out from your GP what type of reimplant was done by your surgeon. Consider a contrast based study (IVP) or spiral CT scan with reconstruction. These studies will identify a stone, and if an obstruction is present. If a stone is present, and is causing you pain, you may want to see the urologist a little earlier. Good Luck!
The information provided in this forum is presented for general educational purposes only. Specific questions you have pertaining to your health should always be directed to your personal physician.
Sincerely,
HFHS M.D.-AK
*keyword: Renal Calculi