Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
HIV Prevention  (Expert Forum)
 | 
If a wound is not bleeding can it still be a point of transmission?
Answered by
University of Washington Seattle - WA
This forum is limited to prevention of HIV and to safe sex in general. If you believe you might have been exposed to HIV and want help to judge your risk, would like advice about HIV testing, or have questions about the effectiveness of condoms or the risks associated with specific sexual practices, this is the site for you.

IMPORTANT

No questions will be accepted on the treatment of HIV/AIDS or its complications, viral load, and similar topics. If you have questions about a specific STD other than HIV/AIDS, please visit the STD Forum. Questions that do not pertain to the above topics will be removed from the forum.

If you have not done so, please review other threads in our archives for questions similar to yours and Dr. Handsfield's replies. Questions that duplicate other frequent ones, for which abundant replies exist, and that have little educational value for other forum users, will be DELETED WITHOUT RESPONSE. YOUR PAYMENT WILL NOT BE REFUNDED. The most common examples of such questions are those about low risk exposures to HIV, such as oral sex, condom- protected intercourse hand-to-genital exposure, and nonsexual contact with possibly infected blood or body fluids as well as symptoms of early HIV infection.

If a wound is not bleeding can it still be a point of transmission?

by Orangechicken, Aug 11, 2006 12:00AM
Dr HHH,



i had a small wound on my hand and I believe that I may have come in contact with a small amount of blood (i was high on marijuana)my cut was at least a few days old or at least not bleeding.

I have read that if a cut is not bleeding and/or more than a day old it cannot/will not allow hiv to enter.

do you support this?



I tested neg at 4 weeks also. conclusive?

by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D., Aug 11, 2006 12:00AM
Zero risk for HIV transmission.  If that sort of exposure could transmit it, HIV would be 100 times more common than it is.  (Even with a fresh, bleeding cut, the chance of getting HIV from touching someone's blood is extremely low.)



You didn't need testing at all, and I would have recommended against it.  Your 4 week test therefore is conclusive.



Good luck--  HHH, MD
Member Comments (4)

by skerdstraght68, Aug 11, 2006 12:00AM
No need to even test.

by Orangechicken, Aug 12, 2006 12:00AM
To: Dr HHH
The blood coming from a person nose that i was helping. I was high and didnt think about hiv till after. I did rinse my fingers with liquor afterward. It was freshblood not blood that had been sitting.

by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D., Aug 12, 2006 12:00AM
To: Chrispus
Even with fresh blood, the risk was low. In that circumstance the answer to your original question is yes, an older, healing cut is not a risk even if directly exposed to the blood.



HHH, MD

by aogm720401, Mar 24, 2008 02:08AM
A related discussion, What about a similar situation was started.
Continue discussion
Expert Activity
National Spinal Health Day
Oct 08 by Adam R. Tanase, D.C.
PAD Awareness Month
Oct 05 by Lee Kirksey, MD
When You Need to Know If You're Pre...
Sep 11 by Elaine Brown, MD
Related Expert Forums
Related Communities