Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Breast Cancer  (Expert Forum)
 | 
Surgery decision, newl y diagnosed with cancer
Questions posted in the Breast Cancer Forum are answered by medical professionals from The Cleveland Clinic. Topics include Breast Biopsy, Chemotherapy, Hormone Therapy, Lumps, Lumpectomy, Lymph node dissection, Lymphedema, Mammograms, Mastectomy, Radiation Therapy, Reconstruction, Self Breast Exam, and Surgery.

Surgery decision, newl y diagnosed with cancer

by leah1234, Jul 06, 2006 12:00AM
I have just been diagnosed with breast cancer and have to decide if I want the lump removed and 5 weeks of radiation or the whole breast removed. They do not know what stage or kind of cancer and I quess they will not until the surgery. I am pretified and do not know what to do. I am 40 years old.

by CCF-RN,MSN-JS, Jul 10, 2006 12:00AM
Dear leah1234, The decision to have a lumpectomy or mastecomy can be a difficult one when both are viable options. Most research shows that lumpectomy (with clean surgical margins) combined with radiation therapy has comparable results to mastectomy. An important consideration is whether there is adequate breast tissue remaining after lumpectomy to produce a good cosmetic result. There are some situations in which lumpectomy may be associated with a higher risk of recurrence such as with large cancers and when it is multifocal (involving more than one area in the breast).  A surgeon with expertise in breast cancer would best be able to advise you of the pros and cons of each approach for your particular situation.

Member Comments (15)

by Granny47, Jul 06, 2006 12:00AM
5 years ago I was in your same situation.  I knew I had a small tumor but had no idea if there was lymph node involvement.  My family and I talked to the surgeon and I decided on the lumpectomy and radiation.  Surgery removed a 1cm tumor and lymph nodes were negative.  I had 36 radiation treatments.  While it was not fun, it was not the worst experience of my life. I believe your age will come into consideration as the cancer can be more aggressive the younger you are (I was 53).  Seriously consider a mastectomy and reconstruction.  I will keep you in my prayers.

by Lynn T., Jul 06, 2006 12:00AM
I was diagnosed in January of this year and I am 53.  I opted for a lumpectomy, but after the surgery it was discovered that a lymph node was involved.  I went ahead and had a masectomy and I have to tell you it was not that bad. It is just a scar on my chest and it really doesn't bother me a lot.  I am just glad to have the cancer out and the option of reconstruction down the line.  Due to my lymph node involvement, I am undergoing chemotherapy.  Since I only had one lymph node involved, and had a masectomy, I won't need radiation.  I will move on to reconstruction.



Be agressive with your cancer treatment - cancer is hitting you at a young age, so you want to fight with all tools available.  Get a second opinion if you feel more comfortable.  It's your life, your body, your future.

by Happy4825, Jul 06, 2006 12:00AM
To: Leah1234
Your choice, if you do choose a Mastectomy, with reconstruction   is a smart one.  I am glad I had a Mastectomy, it wasn't bad at all.  Good Luck.

by japdip, Jul 06, 2006 12:00AM
To: leah1234
Your surgeon should be able to give you some guidance as to the type of surgery that would best benefit your situation. No amount of advice from others can do much for you except to give you varied opinions and possibly increase your knowledge about lumpectomy verses mastectomy. I personally chose mastectomy but I was 25 yrs. older than you and I'm not sure how I would have felt about it at age 40. I didn't opt for reconstruction but that too is an entirely personal decision. I was fortunate that no lymph nodes were involved and I had no additional treatment following the mastectomy which by the way was no big deal for me. I actually had more discomfort after my biopsy than following the mastectomy. One thing I will advise though is TAKE YOUR TIME and explore all avenues of treatment; this is NOT the time to rush into anything. Best Wishes ......

by leah1234, Jul 06, 2006 12:00AM
Thank-you for to all of you that have responded to me.



The doctor advised due to my age I have the lumpectomy but he said it was my decision. He told me that the survival rate is the same with both decisions except the fact that cancer can come back in the breast .



thank you all who have responded. It just helps to hear from others

by muse2, Jul 07, 2006 12:00AM
To: Leah1234
Leah,  How were you diagnosed?  Your surgeon can always talk to your again after the lumpectomy.  You will have 3-4 weeks before you can start radiation and time to decide with the doctor's advice if mastectomy would be better.



I am 45 and did not even consider a mastectomy because the surgical excision biopsy gave me clear margins the second time so radiation actually returns my risk to recurrance as very low in the same breast.  I knew that if they could not clear the margins, I would be going ahead with the mastectomy.



I also knew I would then have options for reconstruction, but was very relieved that I did not loose my summer to the recovery the mastectomy and reconstruction would have required over my two outpatient excisions.



You do have a lot of options, ask a lot of questions of surgeon, oncologist, and radiologist.  Now's the time!

by leah1234, Jul 07, 2006 12:00AM
To: all
I had a mamo and ultrasound which led to the biospy.

I became very sick during the biospy and they were only able to get one sample and I am not sure if that is why they do not know what stadge of cancer it is or if that is normal not to know until after the surgery.

I am leaning toward the lumpectomy because it seems a shorter recovery time. Does radiation not start right after surgery?

by who_is_this, Jul 07, 2006 12:00AM
I was much younger, and had a mastectomy with reconstruction that looks really good.  Do what feels right to you.  Hope everything works out well for you.

by lizziecee, Jul 07, 2006 12:00AM
I had a 2cm non palpable lump and initially was offered either lumpectomy and radiotherapy or mastectomy. I was told at that stage they would do lymph node sampling as SNB was not common in the UK 3 yrs ago. I decided to go with lumpectomy, figuring I could always go back for a mastectomy. It turned out that I had malignancy in 2 of the 8 nodes sampled and went back a month later (had infection at the lumpectomy site) for a total axillary clearance. Another 2 nodes were cancerous. My surgeon got clear margins on the tumour and I didn't need a mastectomy although it was quite a shock to find I needed chemo, then radiotherapy. I have a half moon scar under my nipple/aureola but it is not disfiguring at all. I am very happy with the decision I made considering I knew nothing about breast cancer.

Everyone is different, but it is good that you are seeking other patients' views. I only got onto the internet when going through chemo so really made my decisions on very little knowledge.

I wish you well and hope everything turns out okay.

Liz.

by boninclyde