Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Thyroid  (Expert Forum)
 | 
hypercalcemia with low associated PTH- need opinion of another endo.
Answered by
Mark Lupo, M.D. - Thyroid Nodules, Thyroid Cancer, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, Thyroid Ultrasound
Thyroid & Endocrine Center of Florida Sarasota - FL
Questions in the Thyroid forum are answered by Dr. Mark Lupo. Topics covered include goiter, graves disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, hyperthyroid, hypothyroid, thyroid cancers, thyroiditis, and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).

hypercalcemia with low associated PTH- need opinion of another endo.

by caravan25, Mar 10, 2006 12:00AM
I am 31, male. 4 months ago, I had blood tests as part of a physical.I was found to have high serum calcium (11.4). All other results normal.TSH level in normal range; 2.656. Parathyroid obtained w/ low-normal results (13 pg/ml in range of 12-65). There is a history of hypercalcemia in my family, never treated, and though maybe due to hyperpara., parathyroid levels unknown. Primary Dr. tested my blood twice after: decreasing Ca. (11.1 and 10.7, in range of 8.5-10.6). Also had CT of chest/abdomen with normal results due to some blood in sputum (later determined as coming from a sinus infection). Under treatment of an Endo., I had more tests: Cal. now normal, 24 urine Cal. normal, vitamin D deficient, low-normal phosphate. I am VERY afraid that hypercal. is being caused by malignancy, but the Endo. is not worried, insists that she sees nothing in my workup to suggest malignancy, and that the possibility of this would be a last-case scenario. She insists that with my age, mild Ca. Elevations, and ambulatory state, I would be the “first one” she’s heard of to have Humoral Hypercalcemia of Malignancy while not sick in the hospital. Meanwhile, she has me on vitamin D supplements (insists it will not raise my Ca. because of the low amt. prescribed) and I will take more blood tests and bone density scan. She believes it to be a “tubular” syndrome. I am confused about all of this, as what I have read on sites such as e-medicin suggest that I probably have cancer. Does vitamin D deficeny futher suggest cancer? Are more tests/scans called for? She felt PTHrP test unnecessary...Thanks.

by Mark Lupo, M.D., Mar 10, 2006 12:00AM
The high calcium and vit D deficiency is not a usual combination -- not sure why it was 11.1 and now nl.  I think Vit D treatment is fine as long as Ca++ is monitored closely.  The low PTH suggests that the high Ca++ initially discovered was "non-parathyroid" origin but if it were a malignancy the Ca++ would typically be on the further rise.  Make sure both 25-OH-D and 1,25-OH2-D were both checked to assess vit D.  If Ca increases again and PTH is still low then check PTHrp as well as protein electrophoresis of blood and urine to exclude the unlikely multiple myeloma (if not already done).
Continue discussion
Expert Activity
Rising Healthcare Costs Dont Equal ...
13 hrs ago by Lee Kirksey, MD
Fluoroquinolones increase risk of t...
Jul 08 by Enoch Choi, MD
Related Expert Forums
Related Communities