Nocardia
Answered by
This forum is for questions and support regarding lung and respiratory issues such as: Allergies, Asthma, Bronchitis, Colds - Flu, Chronic Cough, COPD, Cystic Fibrosis, Emphysema, Fibrosis, Lung Abscess, Nasal Polyps, Pleurisy, Pneumonia, Sarcoidosis, Sinusitis, Tuberculosis

There are certain media they can use to enhance growth of this organism. Also, increasing normal incubation times can help in looking, as sometimes this organism takes awhile to grow.
I've only seen this organism a handful of times over my thirty year career in microbiology. It indeed can be come disseminated. I remember we had a patient back in the 70's that had it in wounds, urine, CSF, and other specimens. We are a large laboratory and when we suspect it, we send it out to the state reference lab, as the media to ID it is fussy, and we only run into it a couple of times a year. However, we send out preliminary reports so the doc knows we are suspicious of this organism. Looks like you have a good lab backing up your doc.
Unfortunately we lab people are not privy to the treatment regimen for this disease, so I can't help you there. We ID it, then the doc takes it from there.
Good luck to you.
The integrity of the collected specimen is paramount, and the lab is totally dependent upon the physician to collect a good bronchial wash, lavage, or brushing. These types of specimens are pretty much routinely ordered for bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial culture (acid fast organisms like TB), whereas expectorated sputum specimens are not the best for any type of specimen, unless the patient is actively producing purulent sputum and you get a first morning specimen.
I don't have any contact with the tissue side of the report (i.e. the pathologist reading smears) but I would suspect a thorough history sent along with the specimens would be immensely appreciated by them also. Doctors have the luxury of picking up the phone, calling another physician, and are able to compare notes on specimens. We in the lab don't have that much opportunity to do that, unless infectious disease docs are on the case and happen to let us know what's going on. I would suspect that large medical centers such as a medical school (Baylor is one) would see more of these types of specimens than a small community hospital. It is the same way in microbiology. We do the work for four hospitals and see a lot more in the way of pathogens than a small rural laboratory. Many small hospitals don't even have microbiology departments any more so they refer all their microbiology specimens. Extensive travel time can cut down on recovery of fragile organisms. I personally think it's best to have these types of procedures performed in a place large enough to have microbiology on-site. We get numerous courier runs per day from our community hospitals that feed into our lab, as they are all in the city limits. Some rural hospitals, however, are 50-60 minutes away from their referral lab, and may only get one to two couriers a day to transport these specimens. They may sit in a car for awhile until the courier performs all of their stops and gets back to the lab.
In microbiology, specimen integrity is everything.
Thank you..Nancy