Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Neurology Community
This forum is for questions and support regarding neurology issues such as: Alzheimer's Disease, ALS, Autism, Brain Cancer, Cerebral Palsy, Chronic Pain, Epilepsy, Fibromyalgia, Headaches, MS, Neuralgia, Neuropathy, Parkinson's Disease, RSD, Sleep Disorders, Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury
Results of NCV/EMG
by Murray2, Sep 26, 2007 07:15PM
Sorry if I posted this to the wrong forum, but I was wondering if someone could possibly decipher the results of my test. Thanks in advance:
Findings:
Right peroneal motor response had normal distal latency, mildly decreased amplitude, and severely slow conduction velocity. Left peroneal motor response had normal distal latency, amplitude, and mildly slow conduction velocity. Bilateral tibial motor responses had normal distal latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity. F-wave latencies were normal.
Left superficial peroneal and right sural sensory response were absent. Right superficial peroneal sensory response had normal amplitude and moderately slow conduction velocity. Left sural sensory response had normal amplitude and borderline conduction velocity. Needle EMG of selected muscles of both lower extremities showed no active and no chronic denervation changes. There was no primary myopathic pattern.
Conclusion:
There is electrophysiological evidence of moderate sensory greater than motor polyneuropathy affection both lower extremities. The pattern seems mixed. There is no evidence of radiculopathy or myopathy.
Findings:
Right peroneal motor response had normal distal latency, mildly decreased amplitude, and severely slow conduction velocity. Left peroneal motor response had normal distal latency, amplitude, and mildly slow conduction velocity. Bilateral tibial motor responses had normal distal latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity. F-wave latencies were normal.
Left superficial peroneal and right sural sensory response were absent. Right superficial peroneal sensory response had normal amplitude and moderately slow conduction velocity. Left sural sensory response had normal amplitude and borderline conduction velocity. Needle EMG of selected muscles of both lower extremities showed no active and no chronic denervation changes. There was no primary myopathic pattern.
Conclusion:
There is electrophysiological evidence of moderate sensory greater than motor polyneuropathy affection both lower extremities. The pattern seems mixed. There is no evidence of radiculopathy or myopathy.
Post Comment
