Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.

Heart Disease Community

This patient support community is for discussions relating to angina, angioplasty, arrhythmia, bypass surgery, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, defibrillator, heart attack, heart disease, high blood pressure, mitral valve, pacemaker, PAD, stenosis, and stress tests.
 | 

Need someone's insight please

by Bereagal, Oct 29, 2007 12:44PM
10/18/07
    I have the stress test results that I recently had, I had to go to the ER for what I now know was an anxiety attack. Dr. thought it appropriate to do all the cardiac tests just to be sure. Here are the results from a nuclear imaging stress test:  Stress EKG negative for inducible ischemia,,, hyperdynamic global left ventricular systolic function, most likely secondary to small cavitary dimensions,,,,mild concentric LVH,,, predominantly fixed inferior and inferolateral perfusion defect appears artifactual given intact wall thickening. Similarly, basilar anteroseptal defect also appears artifactual and I doubt prior infarct,,, No significant scintigraphic reversible ischemia demonstrated.
Does this ound like a normal result, except for the LVH and my dr. has explained that it came from BP. What does artifactual mean? By the way I am a 38 year old female with absolutely no family history of heart disease and BPis now well controlled with medicine. Thanks alot for any help.  
To:
Member Comments (3)

by Tarheelguy1967, Oct 29, 2007 01:52PM
Did your doctor not explain the test results to you???  If he/she did not go over the results of your stress test, I'd probably look for another one.  Your results look very good to me, but I'm no doctor.

by deedle1976, Oct 29, 2007 04:17PM
Artifactural it's not really there but is 'manmade'. So the finding is actually related to the imaging process itself or other technical reasons.

by Bereagal, Oct 29, 2007 04:25PM
To: Tarheelguy1967
My dr. did go over the results with me, and the only thing that he called my attention to was the mild lvh. He just said that my BP needed to be controlled ( it is now with meds) and that was pretty much it. i have just gotten a copy of the full report and was just wondering what all the medical jargon meant in layman's terms. Do you know if the LVH will regress with controlled BP, mine is now staying pretty steady at 118-125 over 78-80? If it will regress how long does it take to see a difference in it. I don't know what my measurements were on the test. I started BP meds in March of 2007. Thanks again for the help. I appreciate it alot.
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
SBF is trying
Comment on Heading out on vaca...
1 hr by SBF
Comment on First day after sum...
1 hr by SBF
whatever
2 hrs ago by Coffeebean208
great so far
2 hrs ago by Coffeebean208
still little sleep
2 hrs ago by Coffeebean208
Comment on What's wrong with m...
2 hrs ago by April2
momeluv is so sorry & would just like to say in advance and again...
Expert Activity
Rising Healthcare Costs Dont Equal ...
Jul 24 by Lee Kirksey, MD
Fluoroquinolones increase risk of t...
Jul 08 by Enoch Choi, MD
Community Members