Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Our Ask A Doctor Ophthalmology Forum is where you can post your question and receive a personal answer from physicians affiliated with the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
I have worn monovision contactsContact dermatitis for over 20 years and have never had the problems that make this treatment unworkable for some. My husband has one older IOL and one reSTOR lens; he thinks I'd be mistaken to have monovision IOLs, although I notice that he doesn't like to drive at night, anymore. I have heard about the haloes and glare that can be a side-effect of reSTOR lenses, although he insists he has neither of these problems.
I am impressed with these answers, and I'll move ahead on the suggestions.
Jodie, I've had the same feeling from the beginning of my enquiries. If an advocate believes in something, or had the procedure and must defend it, or is pushing it for any reason (financial or referral,) then that opinion must be discounted.
No he meant there are 3 types of multifocalMultifocal atrial tachycardia IOLs (Crystalens, ReZoom. ReStor). These aren't just different brands, they use different methods to give a range of foci.
Thanks, foureyes. I should have read the post again before asking my question.
I have printed out dozens of pages, from different sites, about the three multifocalMultifocal atrial tachycardia IOLs and am beginning to get an idea of how they differ. There is always the mention of possible halos and glare with ReZoom and reSTOR but not with Crystalens, (an IOL that has other possible negatives, I read.)
Sender Howard Savage
Sender Description ophthalmologist
Sender Email howard.***@****
Sender Address 2150 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Wash., DC 20037
Date Received 15/11/2004 19:20:37
I certify that I have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with a direct financial interest in the subject matter of my criticisms.
Different IOLs have different risks of halos and different focal distances. Find the right surgeon, ask your excellent questions and you'll find the best options for your needs. -RSR MD
Jodie, I've had the same feeling from the beginning of my enquiries. If an advocate believes in something, or had the procedure and must defend it, or is pushing it for any reason (financial or referral,) then that opinion must be discounted.
RSR-MD, what do you mean by: there are three surgeons so experienced? In this forum? I live near Duke University and have access to Duke Eye Center, where a well-known surgeon, Alan Carlson, does these operations. I want to be informed before I meet with him.
I have printed out dozens of pages, from different sites, about the three multifocal IOLs and am beginning to get an idea of how they differ. There is always the mention of possible halos and glare with ReZoom and reSTOR but not with Crystalens, (an IOL that has other possible negatives, I read.)
I am trying to find out what possible negatives there would be to permanent monovision, as opposed to the contact-lens monovision that I've used for decades. Over the years, and as I aged, my optometrist had to work hard to get my monovision balance right...good or adequate distance vision plus being able to read fine print. I used driving glasses for years and then ended up driving with my progressive spectacles. My advancing cataracts further clouded the issue.
I guess the only answer to this is a face-to-face interview with a surgeon who has enough time to consider a patient's personal needs.
Sender Howard Savage
Sender Description ophthalmologist
Sender Email howard.***@****
Sender Address 2150 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Wash., DC 20037
Date Received 15/11/2004 19:20:37
The conclusions of the review abstract suggest that multifocals improved quality of near vision over the monofocal IOL, however in several studies noted (ie: Javitt & Steinert the refractive error targeted with monofocal IOLs is not mentioned. It is thus assumed that emmetropia was the goal, rather than monovision. A better question is how do patients with monovision IOL implants function compared to those with the Array. In my experience, patients prefer monovision! There is no glare or halo, and the quality of vision is sufficient for most to function unaided, including night driving.
HIS
I certify that I have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with a direct financial interest in the subject matter of my criticisms.
You can read more details about my lens implant experience at the following medhelp posts:
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/show/311691
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ophthalmology/messages/54.html