This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18243182?dopt=AbstractPlus
TnHepGuy
I suppose there's no way to know unless everyone recieved a liver biopsy and tested it for +PCR RNA.
Crazy virus to say the least!
Thanks for the article.
If there is truth to this immune system low level infection, then I could not imagine why it would not be able to also replicate in similar tissues and cells in almost anyone. My take is that the researchers now need to look at two groups, and determine what the percentage of positive HCV infection is within immune and lymphatic cell structures among these groups. Those groups would first be those close or intimate contacts of persons who have had true, blood borne, chronic HCV infections. The second group would be the general population, in order to see what the real rate of 'underlying immune system HCV infection' might look like. It could be on the lower side, like 2% (reflecting chiefly those who also concurrently have the full blown CHC infection, or even up to 5% or 10%, reflecting mostly those infected AND their close contacts, etc. Or, there could already, over the many hundreds of years, be a large percentage of the population that has become a 'silent carrier' of this lymphatic form of infection. (as are many other viruses...EBV, HPV, HSV, etc.) Who knows, this could be present as Ginger stated above, in much of the population.
The first thing they need to absolutely determine though is this: whether this form of infection is able to exist in those who have never had the full blown HCV chronic blood liver infection. They need to test for this 'lymphatic infection' in those who have absolutely no viral load on PCR testing in the blood, and no reactivity to the HCV antibody test using the typical blood testing. If it turns out that there are populations out there harboring ONLY this 'silent' form of HCV infection, then we have an entirely new ballgame. We would then need to learn what this form of infection might do, or what problems might develop, and also to understand what, if anything, could provoke this low level, in-check, immune system infection to cross over the humoral immune system barriers, and become a chronic HCV blood borne infection. I want to know more about this subject, and I bet the researchers are really whetting their appetites after these study findings. We learn more every year about HCV!
DoubleDose
The current assumption is that the virus is assumed to be 'controlled/contained' via the immune system. If that's the case, then by definition it (the virus) is generating an immuno-response. And more to the point, it's generating a chronic immuno-response to maintain containment. The question then becomes what systemic negative effects (if any) might this constant immune stimulation/response lead to?
Also, how many other low-level 'contained' viral infections (be they hepatitis or non-hepatitis) might each of us have? And are they generally considered benign - or might each 'ramp-up' the immune system in it's own particular manner, thereby leading to potential long-term damage and/or other concerns?
And of course, how much is anyone with any form of occult viral infection at risk for viral rebound should the immune system become compromised in any fashion (e.g. - through immuno-suppressants, auto-immune concerns, age-related immune issues, etc)?
TnHepGuy
I wonder if any of this could play into the underlying causes or mechanisms for cause-undetermined illnesses like CFS, Fibromyalgia, or even Sjogren's, and other autoimmune