This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
Interesting you should ask this question, because I've been considering trying to get my husband to tx without a bx (biopsy) first. Reason being is that they couldn't start an IV before his bx, and therefore wouldn't do it. There is a test called the Fibroscan, which is noninvasive and measures the stiffness of your liver- but it's not easy to get. Most docs don't have the machine and I think insurance often doesn't cover it. I may try to get my hubby one.
There is a test called the FibroSpect II, but I found it to be very unreliable. It's supposed to be quite accurate at Stage 0-1 or 4 but not so great for the middle stages. I found it be be very misleading- my FibroSpect II score was 69- indicating Stage 3. My bx was a Stage 1!!! Big difference, huh :) ? Now there are some blood tests that will give you an idication of how your liver is doing. For instance, your platelets and albumin dropping can often mean that your liver damage is pregressing. And rising bilirubin can mean that also. My husband has low platelets and his albumin is getting on the low side too- so I'm betting he's in need of tx.
Bottom line is- getting tx without getting a bx first is certainly better than doing nothing! If you can't get a bx or are too afraid to (it's no biggie, btw- ask for Versed first, it's way relaxing)- then you probably should just take what info you have and try to make an educated decision with an experienced hepatologist. I would say you'd be better off assuming your liver is in need of some help and tx'ing than assuming your liver is fine and not doing tx.
Good luck whatever you decide!
I started tx 3 weeks ago and did NOT have a liver biopsy. I am Genotype 2b which is the easiest genotype to clear.
I did have three tests though in this order:
1) Ultrasound of liver -- mainly to check for presence of tumors (none)
2) Fibrospect II -- "16" Index and 90% accuracy for F0-F1
3) PillCam ESO -- swallowed a pill camera so doctor could see esophagus lining -- he wanted to make sure there were no varices (varicose veins that could burst which would not be good... usually seen after cirrhosis has developed I believe...) I had none at all, and tissue was perfectly healthy.
After doing a lot of reading on biopsies, I decided there was still a lot of "gray area" with the results, as you are only testing one tiny area of the liver. The Fibroscan is probably the better tool for determining extent of damage as it seems doctors probe many different areas. If I lived near a Fibroscan machine I probably would have a scan. I used to live in LA and once I feel better after treatment, I might go visit relatives and have a Fibroscan too!
Hope this helps some... Do you not want to do a biopsy, is that why you ask? Just curious...
pK
Anthem BCBS would not cover meds without a biopsy. (I'm 1b)
The biopsy was one of the easiest and pain free procedures I've ever had. I'd rather have 5 Bx's than another colonoscopy.
David
Good luck to you all!
Darla