Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
This forum is for questions and support regarding neurology issues such as:
Alzheimer's Disease,
ALS,
Autism, Brain Cancer,
Cerebral Palsy, Chronic Pain,
Epilepsy,
Fibromyalgia, Headaches, MS, Neuralgia, Neuropathy, Parkinson's Disease, RSD, Sleep Disorders,
Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury
This is a bit unusual, but not rare. What you had during the EEG could have been a seizure. But it is obvious that the EEG did not quite show an 'epileptic activity'. It did show slowing.
I would now go for a video EEG with the similar excitation procedures. What it does is help the doctors have a clearer picture to come up with a diagnosis.
A PET scan will be of help only if you have a stable lesion in the brain. You can not expect similar symptoms to occur during a PET scan.
Regards
I know you must see many patients and I appreciate your time in responding to my post.
I wanted to state that the PET scan was of the brain and it was ordered because of the symptoms listed in my previous post. The initial results of the PET by the radiologist interpreted it as "diminished blood flow to the parietal lobe" and suggested correlation with a recent MRI of the brain which came back as normal.
According to the test, nuclear medicine stated the radioactive solution injected did not metabolize correctly in the parietal lobe. Before having this test, the research I found suggested this test was easily interpreted by the colors of the picture ie. hot spots, dark colors, light colors.
The PET has been subjectively interpreted differently by MD and Neuro who find nothing wrong with it.
My questions:
Does a normal MRI of the brain conlcude that the PET was in fact normal?
Does the "slow buildup" during normal EEG confirm the PET results were abnormal?
Who do I need to see for clarification of the PET test?
Will having a video EEG confirm or dismiss the PET scan?
Most recently I have had amino acid blood plasma testing. The amino acid urine testing I've already completed came back normal, but Aspartic acid was increased at 242 while the max is 62. Could this be the cause for the abnormal PET scan? And could this be a factor in my hormone problems?
Again, thank you for your assistance and I appreciate your suggestions.
What could "slowing" during an EEG mean if it is not a seizure?
About slowing of EEG, you can consider pervasive developmental disorders, depression, and post concussion syndrome as the causes. Slow waves are brain waves less than 8Hz. These waves are called as delta and theta waves. Slow waves can not be normal in an adult who is awake. They are normal in NREM stages 3 and 4 of sleep.
MRI and PET scan:
If PET scan is normal, it means all the areas of the brain are taking up good amount of sugar. This is rare with a lesion. An MRI which is normal can confirm the findings of a normal PET scan.
The slow build up may not significantly alter the amount of sugar uptake.
The PET scan should be ideally interpreted by a Radiologist, preferably a Neuroradiologist.
PET scan and EEG are two different procedures, running on two different principles. But they are basically trying to catch some dysfunction of the brain. While EEG can go on recording the brain activity for half an hour, PET scan is more like a cross sectional procedure.
A video EEG will not be able to prove a PET scan either correct or incorrect.
A raised aspartate level will probably show diffuse changes on the PET scan.
Regards