Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.

Heart Rhythm Community

This patient support community is for discussions relating to heart rhythm issues, arrhythmia, irregular heartbeat, implanted defibrillators, pacemakers, and tachycardia.
 | 

SVT dangerous? Considering Ablation

by missm2, Apr 11, 2008 11:24AM
Tags: svt, dangerous
I am 27 years old and in the past year was diagnosed with SVT,PSVT, Mitral Valve. I had the SVT pretty much under control with metropolol.In the past couple of weeks it is starting to "breakthrough' again in between my meds. They have already discussed ablation with me, but I wanted to hold off to think about it and try to control it with meds. My doc. told me that SVT was not life threatening. But I have been reading differently. Can anyone tell me their experience with this? And any ablation stories? It's really starting to interfere with my quality of life. If I get too hot, exercise,nervous..etc. it really bothers me. Thanks in advance
Member Comments (6)

by SillyHeart, Apr 11, 2008 11:47AM
SVT isn't life threatening, but since it can really ruin a person's life in other ways (as you described) ablation can really be a great option.  Several people here have had ablations.  You can search for their posts.

by sueinns, Apr 11, 2008 12:03PM
To: missm2
In a structurally normal heart, SVT is not dangerous although it sure does make you feel crappy.  I can completely relate to your symptoms.  The problem with treating it with drugs is they do sometimes lose their effectiveness.  I had an ablation in January and although I am still bothered by PVC's (a different arrhythmia), I no longer have the horrible symptoms of SVT.  I have no regrets.

The only thing that I have read and been told about SVT is that it slightly increases your risk for developing atrial fibrillation.  Ablation has a cure rate of close to 95% for SVT (depending on location).  It's a quality of life decision and SVT can be very hard to live with.  However, some folks do quite well on drugs and some even decide to live with it (brave souls).  It's a personal choice.

by isukathis, Apr 11, 2008 02:33PM
To: missm2
Hi...

I have had SVT for over 20 years now and I take no medication and have decided against an ablation. I only get about 2 strong episodes a year (240bpm). I have been told repeatedly by my cardiologist that this isn't life threatening for me. I am in very good health (been jogging for 10 years) and through many test have been told my heart is absolutely "normal".

I think having an ablation is a personal decision. If I was getting experiencing the same symptoms by some of the people described on this forum I wouldn't hesitate in having the procedure.

I think I will hold off on an ablation until I am either told I definitely should have one or I'm much older and my SVT changes my quality of life greatly..

Hope this helps...

by bumble72, Apr 14, 2008 03:48PM
hi

I get SVT caused by AVNRT.  I have tried lots of meds and the one that's working for me (at the moment) is flecainide.  I am on the highest dose and do worry about major breakthrough.  I still get the svt but it feels very mild and I can stop it.  It has majorly affected my life so have decided to go for ablation.  only another 11 weeks or so to wait (nhs waiting list)

I have seen lots of docs and they've all assured me it is NOT  life threatening.

by lauren_e, Apr 14, 2008 10:37PM
To: hello
I'm a new member to the forum.  My cardiologist has recommended an ablation for my SVT episodes.  He told me that two upsides for the procedure is that they usually reduce Artial Fib (I get one or two a year) and while they are doing it they can also test for ventrical arrythmias which can be dangerous, anyone have any thoughts?

Also, I can't seem to find any facts about the possible side effects of an ablation, or even the risks overall..

by rosetoes, Apr 15, 2008 07:23AM
To: all
I waited 2 years before having an ablation for SVT/AVNRT and I wish that I hadn't waited.  I was scared to have an ablation but the fear of having SVT was more frightening.  While they would stop it with adenosine, sometimes I had to have two injections to stop it and I always started to panic...what if it wouldn't stop with the adenosine....paddles next?  They could always stop it but the fear was there.  I took beta blockers....violent nightmares, weight gain and most importantly, it didn't stop the SVT.

I had an ablation 2months ago and it was painless, and truly an easy procedure.  My EP dr. had done over 1000 of them and the experience was a great one.  I am now cured, no beta blockers, no worry and I have felt great from the moment I woke from the twlight.

All the worry and anticipation of the ablation was a waste of my time.  I'm so happy now and I'm exercising without any worry whatsoever.  

I can't stress enough to all that the procedure is so worth it and not nearly as bad as it sounds.

Good Luck!
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Comment on Wt Loss Day #8 - TH...
26 mins ago by Ranaesheart
Comment on Abortion
54 mins ago by sunset555
Comment on What is Love ????? ...
55 mins ago by lagoya
BIGMAMA24 had bladder surgery,SORE
greendave is hurting having had a painful fall on wet slippy rocks...
ChitChatNIne added the Pain Tracker
4 hrs ago
Wt Loss Day #8 - THE ROAD LESS TRAV... 
5 hrs ago by ChitChatNIne
itsallwaves added the Pain Tracker
5 hrs ago