Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.

Pregnancy 35+ Community

Our Pregnancy Support Forum is for women 35 years and older. This is where you can communicate with other women who share your interest in pregnancy and childbirth issues. This forum is not monitored by medical professionals.
 | 

Bad NT scan results? N e one else dealt with this.

by jenandjon, May 16, 2008 12:12PM
My NT scan was yesterday and the results ranged from 2.74 to 2.83.  I'm 13w2d and 34.  

N e one else have NT results around 3 or more and have a positive story to share?

Thanks,

Jennifer
Member Comments (5)

by melimeli, May 16, 2008 12:13PM
I forgot what the results are supposed to be.. I know it depends on how many w and d's you are.. so someone that went in at 12w would be a different scale... what did the nurse say?

by melimeli, May 16, 2008 12:47PM
I found this

At 12 weeks of gestational age, an "average" nuchal thickness of 2.18mm has been observed, however, up to 13% of chromosomally normal fetuses present with a nuchal luncency of greater than 2.5mm, and thus for even greater accuracy of predicting risks, the outcome of the nuchal scan may be combined with the results of simultaneous maternal blood tests. The blood test is used to measure the levels of hormones - primarily hCG and PAPP-A. In pregnancies affected by Down syndrome there is a tendency for the levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to be increased and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) to be decreased.

So for 13w2d it would be more... You will have to ask what the norm is for 13w2d but yours doesn't seem that far off...

by melimeli, May 16, 2008 12:50PM
Image 2 shows a baby with an NT of 2.9mm, which is at the upper limit of the normal range. Though the risk will be higher than the baby's in the first image, nine out of 10 babies with a measurement between 2.5mm and 3.5mm will be completely normal.

http://www.babycentre.co.uk/pregnancy/antenatalhealth/scans/nuchalscan/

by carpediemforlife, May 16, 2008 02:12PM
Mine is next Tues and I am so glad that you shared this information.  I am also getting the blood work done as well.

by bizbiz, May 16, 2008 11:19PM
I dont think those results are really a problem. Mine came back at 2.0 and when  I asked my OB what the cutoff was and what was considered low risk/high risk he said as long as its under 3.0 he is happy and wont request any further tests. Also, if you are worried about things like Downs there are other markers that they look for i.e: nasal bones present etc. Remember too that these tests are only scans and cannot tell you for sure - my OB didnt even want me doing them because he said these tests can be so inacurate with so many false positives that there was no point in doing them, but I still wanted to do it regardless.
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
brideofchrist joined this community
Welcome them!
8 mins ago
Comment on Canadian Politics G...
17 mins ago by EricaB28
Comment on Canadian Politics G...
27 mins ago by adgal
Comment on Canadian Politics G...
44 mins ago by EricaB28
Comment on Does it bother you...
57 mins ago by ireneo
Comment on Chick flicks...
1 hr by grammy64
miacante 18wks and excited
Comment on Does it bother you...
2 hrs ago by kennedydp5
Expert Activity
World's longest living person passe...
Dec 02 by Enoch Choi, MD
How To Beat Insomnia Without Medica...
Dec 01 by Steven Y Park, MD
Attention All Mouth Breathers: 5 Im...
Dec 01 by Steven Y Park, MD