This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
Ron
I was dx in Jan 2008, and have probably had it 30 + yrs. who knows.... My life is constantly in flux, but a trial would guarantee the SOC and my insurance runs out next month.... so good luck on your end deciding...
My doctor said that while i was in good health, treat/
My brother who also has hep has taken the other approach, if isnt broke dont fix it.
Its a personal decision but if you read my journal i have listed pro's and con's
good luck
peace
rita
rita, I think your pro/con list is excellent.
I'm mostly interested in information on the Alinia. I can't find that it's going to clinical trial anywhere. Doesn't sound like there's a real protocol developed with it yet.
And then the other stuff...lactoferrin? PPC?
I believe in treating and not waiting. At least in my case... after having weighed out all the pros and cons. Of course, I cannot speak for others. Dr. Dieterich's presentation also inspired me to take the treat as soon as possible approach.
mssmtv.org/player_alf/player.php?id=alf_2007_01
Regarding Alinia, PPC and lactoferrin, it has been discussed in several threads during the last few days.
medhelp.org/posts/show/554160
medhelp.org/posts/show/554438
Hope this will be helpful,
Marcia
I think I'm going to go for the Vertex and not wait for the Alinia.
Thanks to everyone who commented and provided links. :)
Studies show an inverse relationship between age of infection and fibrosis infection (slower progression if you were infected younger) as well as female gender (females progress slower).
All this is to your favor, and it's possible you may never have to treat should you decide to watch and wait which means among other things monitoring liver fibrosis on a regular basis either through biopsy (every 3-5 years) and/or through non-invasive means such as Fibroscan when/if it gets FDA approval.
That said, newer drugs are always evolving and the new kid on the block today may be the SOC of tomorrow, meaning that newer treatments down the road may potentially be shorter and less toxic than even today's most promising PI's. And certainly, if you did want to treat with today's PI's (showing better SVR rates with half the treatment time) I see no reason to jump into a trial when you have time to wait until these drugs become FDA approved. That way you would have not only the benefit of full trial results but would not chance trial restraints such as a placebo group, no helper drugs, etc, etc.
"UpBeat" said it better and shorter: "If it's not broke don't fix it". You say your life has "quited" some. Maybe time to start a new hobby, fitness program, take that trip you've always dreamed about. But not the interferon/riba trip IMHO :)
All the best whatever you decide.
-- Jim
For yourself, the mere fact that you are considering treatment suggests to me that you are not comfortable at the moment, whether it be some tiredness, or just the idea of the virus. If you are a "controlling" type person, I think treatment is a good option. If nothing else, I think it is worth trying, say, 4-12 weeks of treatment, to see how you respond. If symptons are manageable for you, and you respond well, you may choose to carry on. If not, there is probably not much downside to having tried a short period of treatment (although if you trial with newer drugs there could be resistance concerns).
Good luck, whatever you decide. Treatment was the right decision for me, I have a lot of energy now, and am hoping for a SVR verdict soon (touch wood). I didin't find it easy at all though, so I can understand if you decide otherwise.
jmjm530--I've always been of the "ain't broke don't fix" school myself. But . . . in about a year and a half I'll be out of health insurance and I'm not willing to have HCV without health insurance. That's something to consider. Oh and my life being quiet? I have *plenty* to do. Which is why I was thinking that before life takes off on me again, it might be a good idea to do my best to get rid of this virus.
Fl_gator--do you know what the criteria is for pulling people off at 24 weeks? I'll have to ask the nurse here (I'm making a list of questions), because I would be MUCH happier to only treat for 24 weeks--of course assuming that there's a great chance I've cleared for good.
moahunter--I prefer to think of myself as a planner (over a controlling type). ;) Which is why I'm trying to fit tx into my life and posting for the group wisdom.
It's very interesting that since I first started coming here in 2002 this board has become much less pro-tx. It used to be that folks would jump down someone's throat if they suggested a wait-see approach. It seems things are more balanced here now.
I do understand how the cure could end up worse than the condition, at least in my case. That's why I'm cautiously assessing my options.
And I thank you all for posting and helping me with this difficult decision.