301037?1213868178
Sumer K Sethi, MD  
Male
Delhi - India

Specialties: Radiology

Interests: teleradiology

Teleradiology Providers
+91-9811181359
Delhi - India
All Journal Entries Journals
Sort By:  
 |  Del.icio.usYahoo BookmarksFacebookGoogle Bookmarks

Uncomfortable ultrasound, drinking too much water

Dec 19, 2007 03:09AM - 0 comments


SUTTON PA et al in British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 1024
doi: 10.1259/bjr/98506488
Report a very interesting complication of a patient who developed acute confusional stae post ultrasound. The investigations sent by them all returned normal, with the exception of a venous sodium measurement of 119 mmol L–1. On further questioning, the patient's husband revealed that she had been told to "drink as much as she could" prior to the ultrasound scan, and had therefore consumed several litres of water over the course of the afternoon. The confusion settled with fluid restriction, and venous sodium normalized over the next few hours.
ooops......never seen happen in my practise though, seems like some patients follow instructions too strictly!

Again highlights the importance of good communication between medical staff and patients.
Teleradiology Providers
www.teleradproviders.com




 |  Del.icio.usYahoo BookmarksFacebookGoogle Bookmarks

Radiation Dose Concerns

Nov 10, 2007 04:52AM - 1 comments

By Dr Sumer Sethi, MD, Dr MGK Murthy
Teleradiology Providers
www.teleradproviders.com

Radiation  Dose  Concern

Can we know how much radiation is falling on patient?
…… YES…. No definite readable meter on the machine

We can estimate…..

• mGy=0.239 by (Kvp)2 by mAs /(TSD)2by P by T

• TSD=target to skin dist, P=1 for 3 phase X ray
T= total filtration in mm of Al

•   At 72 Kvp and 10 mAs it amounts to =0.1235 mGy


Very difficult  to decipher this

Internatinal Council of Radiation Protection(ICRP) recommends
Effective dose i.e.. Weighed sum of organ dose multiplied by weighing factor for that organ
eg: if gonads receive 10 mrem and their weighing factor is 0.2  effective dose would be 2.


A very practical way used presently is talk about the whole diagnostic  radiation in terms of Chest Xrays

Why?
Probably because  it is least exposure  and most used


Av CXR=foot=ankle=head=arm=ankle=0.05 msv

American Scenario
The chest Xray involved in the routine protocol gives radiation dose same as 23 days of environmental background radiation received in village charlottesville(0.02mSV)(Rare Earth screens)  In India 0.05 mSV(Ca Tungstate  screens)

The precise risk from this not known but is thought to be small.


CTChest
Radiation dose is equal to 1000 days of environmental background radiation in the same place in USA.(8 mSV)

Special situations


• Chest CT in female= 10 to 15 ( 2 view)mammography
• Chest CT=400 Chest Xrays
• HRCT Chest==600 Chest X Rays
• CT virtual Bronchoscopy==3 to 5 times CT Chest
• CT angiography/FNAC=   DO


IRONY
• We have reduced the absolute dose from all examinations due to improved technology and protective measures

• However due to relative ease of performing and, speed and accuracy  and with modern helical CT scanners temptation to obtain head to pelvic or even head to toe examinations is  leading to increased community radiation dose.

• Av radiation to Radiologist in India is 1 mSV/year
• A single CT procedure gives patient dose equivalent  to 5-25 years of  work in radiology department
UK
• Nation wide study by NRPB , wall and hart etl found 30% reduction in patient dose for common rad  procedures compared to 10 years ago ,but 35% increase in abdominal and pelvic CT examinations!!!!!

Reason
• Volume scanning,thin slices,overlap sections,liberal inclusion of wider regions of body,demand for short scan time,demand for high resolution,better quality with high exp factors,frequent repeat studies
• Superficial organs such as breast,eyes, thyroid and testes get higher dose even though they are not the aim of investigation in majority situations
• Delivery of 10 mGy of radiation to a womans breast before 35 years increases  the risk of breast cancer by 13.6% over gen population
• Hoffman found 1036 cases of  on 26 yrs follow up  whole spine radiography in adolescent group(dose) 130 mGy  led to  11 cancers breast   VS   general  population should have been 6

What to Do?
Radiologist
• All techniques for low dose,protection for unexposed parts

Physician
• Clinical justification for a study






 |  Del.icio.usYahoo BookmarksFacebookGoogle Bookmarks

Radiology Grand Rounds are up

Oct 27, 2007 11:37PM - 0 comments

The XVII edition of Radiology Grand Rounds is up at Sumer's Radiology Site
http://sumerdoc.blogspot.com

Here is the Link
http://sumerdoc.blogspot.com/2007/10/radiology-grand-rounds-xvii.html


Archives for the same and available at-
http://www.radiologygrandrounds.blogspot.com/

 |  Del.icio.usYahoo BookmarksFacebookGoogle Bookmarks

Antenatal Ultrasound

Oct 27, 2007 01:44AM - 1 comments



Ultrasound imaging or sonography is based on the priciple of piezo-electric effect.Sound waves are produced by a piezoelectric crystal and images are produced by sound waves being reflected by various organs in the body.It does not use any ionizing radiation.
It is used in pregnancy to determine following things-
Number of fetuses, lie, presentation, fetal maturity, placental localiztion, liquor and congenital anomalies.
Evaluation of early preganancy requires a full bladder (oops!!!) and it is not essential for later stages of pregnancy. Nowadays even three dimensional and four dimensional (3D in real time) are also available which can give 3D representations of fetal face, spine and various congenital anomalies and give the parent an oppurtunity to decide after seeing the baby.

Doppler US can also be used especially in high risk mother like Pregnancy induced hypertension and IUGR to assess utero-placental and fetal blood flow dynamics.

Please note-ultrasound cannot identify all fetal abnormalities. It can determine the sex of the baby (but telling the sex of the baby is illegal in India!!)