I reread the posting to which I took exception. The problem is that you were not "unambiguous," and that what you said could be interpreted as supporting engineering for the greater good.
I make use of sobering statistics on children who have been poisoned, I ironically mention that "therapeutizing" the (mis)behavior of children serves its "purpose", and I even mention the upshot of the present approach of social engineering, specifically, that of altering of individuals so as to serve the means and ends of the mental health enterprise, and you still think that I am being pro-psychiatry? To set the record staight, I am a psychiatric abolitionist because of the continued practices of psychiatry, and its allied fields, of coercions as cure and its ongoing excuses!
"I have ever had a problem with my native language". Please tell me what you found to be offensive in my critique. I don't know how much more unambiguous I could have been in my critique.
I have ever had a problem with my native language. I think you should reread what you wrote.
You obviously did not understand my message whatsoever! George Orwell is a poor example of the kind of society I have in mind. I would say that "Brave new world" would be closer to what the psychiatrization of our culture approaches. SHEESH!
Serves what purpose? Deterioration of the psyche? Obliteration of individuality? Destruction of passion? I am 100 per cent glad I am not you. I have healthy children and grandchildren and not single one of them has ever been engineered for mediocrity. Big Brother is not benevolent. Read George Orwell's "1984," if you haven't already.