So, you had nurse nasty who did not even handle the tube correctly and spazzed out your son... so the doc has to see the tests and will not even know the circumstances...
ACTH would degrade so it was amazing it was even that high (my lab is 6-48) so he was fairly normal...
But he was supposed to be calm during the test after all they want the stim agent to work, not the nurse! But he did not double so that was good and he did not reach the 32 that some docs want but his cortisol was in a normal level to start (due in good part to the IV process I would bet)...
Make sure you tell the doc about the circumstances - it should not be a high enough jump but some docs...
And tell him that nurse should not give the test to children - ever!
thanks so much rumpled, I really appreciate the info and advise! :)
I was wondering about if 18 to 26 at 60 minutes was substantial enough.
I seem to find conflicting answers about that.
Some say if you have a baseline of 18 you are good - well, that seems okay except if you are screaming and crying and at 18.
Others say the cortisol must double - well, we are certainly nowhere near doubling.
Other, as you mentioned, say that you have to be up to 32 or 34.
Gosh, if only it was more cut and dry!
The lab at the hospital tried to tell me that the acth test of baseline was fine sitting out at room temp for 1/2 hour - they said they talked to Mayo Clinic (the place where the blood ultimately went) and they said it was fine.
I wrote to Mayo - they told me 'the sample has been compromised but they will accept the sample' - not sure what that means...
Impact of collection method and sample handling on measured levels of circulating ACTH
If you google that one you will see that they studied room temp collection etc. and found that the difference between standard protocol of collection and room temp is negligible... gosh, now I am wondering if his 27 is the real number, if so - what does that mean for him?
thanks rumpled, I am glad to know it from your personal experience. The studies that I found seem strange to me because why on earth would there be such strict protocol and so much information about its instability if it was all so unnecessary.
Copyright 1994-2018MedHelp.All rights reserved. MedHelp is a division of Vitals Consumer Services, LLC.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.