I also had a biopsy 2 years ago. Diagnosis was :Fibrocystic change including moderate ductal hyperplasia. No evidence of atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma". The original lump was just beneath the left nipple.
A couple of weeks ago I had my annual mammo...the radiologist said it was "okay", but I need to see my doctor for another exam and possible MRI in 3 months. I can feel the scar tissue on the incision area...it is hard and right along the scar. The doctor felt a "thickening" to the right of my left nipple and is concerned. My left breast has felt "full" for the past few months as well.
Now I am really scared. My mother passed away from breast cancer 3 years ago....her mother died from it as did HER mother.
i too have had a lump (directly on my incision) show up five years after the fact (surgery). my doctor says "scar tissue." i said how does scar tissue show up five years later? they did a fnb -- missed the spot. ignored me telling them this. you said a cyst will bring out fluid. what will scar tissue produce when using fnb? thank you so much.
Thanks for the comments. I am asking the surgeon about the fine needle aspiration. I have a feeling he will say they cannot do it here. Should I go back to the states to have it done and avoid another biopsy?
getting a new baseline mammogram 3 months after surgery is what I recommend, also. As to the lump in question, the simplest thing is to do a fine-needle aspiration; ie, putting in a small needle. If it's a cyst, fluid comes out, it goes away, end of problem. If it's not fluid, then the needle will be sampling the area and the material can be looked at under a microscope. If it looks totally innocent, and a mammogram is also innocent, the chance of missing tumor is really small. However, not every location has pathologists skilled in analyzing such small samples.
This is interesting since my surgeon told me specifically that he would order a mammogram 3 months post surgery to establish a new baseline and identify any scar tissue that might develop.
Dear Speechlady, Not really, perhaps an MRI might give a different picture but would still not be able to tell 100% whether what is seen is scar tissue or something else.