Aa
A
A
A
Close
Colon Cancer Community
1.18k Members
Avatar universal

In layman's terms (statistics)

Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies.
Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN.
Source
Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Care Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. ***@****
Abstract
CONTEXT:
Limited evidence exists to guide the optimal frequency of repeat endoscopic examination for colorectal cancer screening after a negative colonoscopy.
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the duration and magnitude of the risk of developing colorectal cancer following performance of a negative colonoscopy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS:
Population-based retrospective analysis of individuals whose colonoscopy evaluations did not result in a diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Patients who had been evaluated between April 1, 1989, and December 31, 2003, were identified using Manitoba Health's physician billing claims database (N = 35 975). Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare colorectal cancer incidence in our cohort with colorectal cancer incidence in the provincial population. Stratified analysis was performed to determine the duration of the reduced risk. Patients with a history of colorectal cancer prior to the index colonoscopy, inflammatory bowel disease, resective colorectal surgery, and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy within the 5 years before the index colonoscopy were excluded. Cohort members were followed up from the time of the index colonoscopy until diagnosis of colorectal cancer, death, out-migration from Manitoba, or end of the study period on December 31, 2003.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Incidence of colorectal cancer.
RESULTS:
Dr., can you explain in layman's terms what this means?  Example:  Does the one year figure of 0.59 mean that less than 1 person out of 1,000 would have colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy?  Since mine was actually only 18 months ago and I am technically low-risk for colorectal cancer (no family history, not yet 50, and none of the risk factors I have read about such as obesity, tobacco use, high fat diet, etc.), I am trying to assess whether or not to push my doctor to have another one done because of my ongoing stomach pains.  Can you explain what this means in layman's terms?

JAMA 2006 - Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies.

A negative colonoscopy was associated with SIRs of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.81) at 6 months, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) at 1 year, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.48-0.72) at 2 years, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41-0.73) at 5 years, and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.09-0.65) at 10 years. The proportion of colorectal cancer located in the right side of the colon was significantly higher in the colonoscopy cohort than the rate in the Manitoba population (47% vs 28%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS:
The risk of developing colorectal cancer remains decreased for more than 10 years following the performance of a negative colonoscopy. There is a need to improve the early detection rate of right-sided colorectal neoplasia in usual clinical practice.
0 Responses
Have an Answer?
Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
Colon Cancer can affect anyone at any age. Ashley Havlena shares her story.
You're never too young for colon cancer. Read on to find out how a fecal occult blood test saved Keith Friend’s life.
Colon cancer screening tests save lives. Learn how you can reduce your risk for colon cancer.
It’s a fact: You’re never too young for colon cancer. Learn more about the disease.
You're never too young for colon cancer. Amr Radwan shares his story.
You're never too young for colon cancer. Angie shares her family's ongoing struggle with cancer.