Your advice last time really helped clarify what we needed to do. Last time when I posted my mom's echo gave a EF reading of 30-33% (done in Jan 2012). So, we scheduled to get a CRT-D implanted in June. A week before the procedure the electrophysiologist conducted a MUGA test. The MUGA test showed the EF at 48%, and the electrophysiologist told us the device is no longer necessary. While we are happy the EF has drastically improved, we are concerned with the accuracy of test. Since there is such a large discrepancy between the two tests done 6 months apart ( she has been on HF medication since Nov 2010, and started out with a 15% EF), we are not sure which test is giving us the accurate reading. I would really appreciate your advice on which test we should follow in order to determine if my mom needs a CRT-D or not.
There are several ways to calculate an EF. Echo is the most common but MUGA, MRI, ventriculogram during cardiac cath, etc can all provide generally reliable EF calculations.
A well performed MUGA test is often fairly reliable. Sometimes the images with Echo can be suboptimal and contrast is needed to truly see the heart walls sufficiently well to make a reliable EF calculation.
Frankly, at the end of the day, I would trust your mom's physician. Electrophysiologists implant ICDs and pacemakers for a living and they believe in them. The fact that the EP doc is advising against it at this time suggests that your mom may not need it. There is no harm in repeating an echo if this would provide you peace of mind but you may find yourself going back and forth with this "dilemma".
I would move forward following the EP doc's advice. If in the future a repeat echo (or MUGA) suggests a deteriorating EF and CRT is now being recommended then I would pursue that at that time.
I know this can be confusing but I suggest you follow the cardiologist's advice. If you do not trust this cardiologist, then I would seek a 2nd opinion.
Copyright 1994-2018MedHelp.All rights reserved. MedHelp is a division of Vitals Consumer Services, LLC.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.