Aa
Fake news is 'killing people's minds'
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/11/fake-news-is-killing-peoples-minds-says-apple-boss-tim-cook
"Fake news is “killing people’s minds”, Tim Cook, the head of Apple, has said. The technology boss said firms such as his own needed to create tools that would help stem the spread of falsehoods, without impinging on freedom of speech.
Cook also called for governments to lead information campaigns to crack down on fake news in an interview with a British national newspaper. The scourge of falsehoods in mainstream political discourse came to the fore during recent campaigns, during which supporters of each side were accused of promoting misinformation for political gain.
“We are going through this period of time right here where unfortunately some of the people that are winning are the people that spend their time trying to get the most clicks, not tell the most truth,” Cook told the Daily Telegraph. “It’s killing people’s minds, in a way.”
He said: “All of us technology companies need to create some tools that help diminish the volume of fake news. We must try to squeeze this without stepping on freedom of speech and of the press, but we must also help the reader. Too many of us are just in the ‘complain’ category right now and haven’t figured out what to do.”
He said that a crackdown would mean that “truthful, reliable, non-sensational, deep news outlets will win”, adding: “The [rise of fake news] is a short-term thing. I don’t believe that people want that.”
While instances were seen among supporters of both sides of the recent US election battle, Donald Trump’s campaign was seen by many as a particular beneficiary of fake news reports.
And the US president’s team has been caught sending aides out to insist that a huge crowd had attended his inauguration, when the evidence showed a relatively modest audience was there.
Trump’s spokesman, Sean Spicer, insisted that the event had attracted “the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration ” and Trump said he believed the crowd went “all the way back to the Washington Monument”.
Advertisement
Images from the moment Trump was taking the oath showed the crowd was relatively small and went nowhere near as far back down Washington’s National Mall as the monument. Other evidence suggested a relatively small crowd in attendance.
Senior aide Kellyanne Conway later characterised the Trump administration’s falsehoods as “alternative facts”.
Fake anti-Trump stories during the election included one in which it was falsely claimed that he had groped the drag queen and television presenter RuPaul. Hillary Clinton was scrutin ised over her claim that there was “no evidence” her emails had been hacked because the FBI director, James Comey, had concluded it was likely they had been.
A study by economists at Stanford University and New York University published two months after November’s US presidential election found that in the run-up to the vote, fake anti-Clinton stories had been shared 30 million times on Facebook, while those favouring her were shared eight million times.
It said: “The average American saw and remembered 0.92 pro-Trump fake news stories and 0.23 pro-Clinton fake news stories, with just over half of those who recalled seeing fake news stories believing them.”
But it called into question the power of fake news reports spread on social media to alter the outcome of the election, saying that, “for fake news to have changed the outcome of the election, a single fake article would need to have had the same persuasive effect as 36 television campaign ads”.
Nevertheless, Cook demanded action to decrease the reach of fake news. “We need the modern version of a public service announcement campaign. It can be done quickly, if there is a will.”
He added: “It has to be ingrained in the schools, it has to be ingrained in the public. There has to be a massive campaign. We have to think through every demographic... It’s almost as if a new course is required for the modern kid, for the digital kid.
“In some ways kids will be the easiest to educate. At least before a certain age, they are very much in listen and understand [mode], and they then push their parents to act. We saw this with environmental issues: kids learning at school and coming home and saying why do you have this plastic bottle? Why are you throwing it away?”
"Fake news is “killing people’s minds”, Tim Cook, the head of Apple, has said. The technology boss said firms such as his own needed to create tools that would help stem the spread of falsehoods, without impinging on freedom of speech.
Cook also called for governments to lead information campaigns to crack down on fake news in an interview with a British national newspaper. The scourge of falsehoods in mainstream political discourse came to the fore during recent campaigns, during which supporters of each side were accused of promoting misinformation for political gain.
“We are going through this period of time right here where unfortunately some of the people that are winning are the people that spend their time trying to get the most clicks, not tell the most truth,” Cook told the Daily Telegraph. “It’s killing people’s minds, in a way.”
He said: “All of us technology companies need to create some tools that help diminish the volume of fake news. We must try to squeeze this without stepping on freedom of speech and of the press, but we must also help the reader. Too many of us are just in the ‘complain’ category right now and haven’t figured out what to do.”
He said that a crackdown would mean that “truthful, reliable, non-sensational, deep news outlets will win”, adding: “The [rise of fake news] is a short-term thing. I don’t believe that people want that.”
While instances were seen among supporters of both sides of the recent US election battle, Donald Trump’s campaign was seen by many as a particular beneficiary of fake news reports.
And the US president’s team has been caught sending aides out to insist that a huge crowd had attended his inauguration, when the evidence showed a relatively modest audience was there.
Trump’s spokesman, Sean Spicer, insisted that the event had attracted “the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration ” and Trump said he believed the crowd went “all the way back to the Washington Monument”.
Advertisement
Images from the moment Trump was taking the oath showed the crowd was relatively small and went nowhere near as far back down Washington’s National Mall as the monument. Other evidence suggested a relatively small crowd in attendance.
Senior aide Kellyanne Conway later characterised the Trump administration’s falsehoods as “alternative facts”.
Fake anti-Trump stories during the election included one in which it was falsely claimed that he had groped the drag queen and television presenter RuPaul. Hillary Clinton was scrutin ised over her claim that there was “no evidence” her emails had been hacked because the FBI director, James Comey, had concluded it was likely they had been.
A study by economists at Stanford University and New York University published two months after November’s US presidential election found that in the run-up to the vote, fake anti-Clinton stories had been shared 30 million times on Facebook, while those favouring her were shared eight million times.
It said: “The average American saw and remembered 0.92 pro-Trump fake news stories and 0.23 pro-Clinton fake news stories, with just over half of those who recalled seeing fake news stories believing them.”
But it called into question the power of fake news reports spread on social media to alter the outcome of the election, saying that, “for fake news to have changed the outcome of the election, a single fake article would need to have had the same persuasive effect as 36 television campaign ads”.
Nevertheless, Cook demanded action to decrease the reach of fake news. “We need the modern version of a public service announcement campaign. It can be done quickly, if there is a will.”
He added: “It has to be ingrained in the schools, it has to be ingrained in the public. There has to be a massive campaign. We have to think through every demographic... It’s almost as if a new course is required for the modern kid, for the digital kid.
“In some ways kids will be the easiest to educate. At least before a certain age, they are very much in listen and understand [mode], and they then push their parents to act. We saw this with environmental issues: kids learning at school and coming home and saying why do you have this plastic bottle? Why are you throwing it away?”
I agree, I am having so much trouble figuring out what is real and what is fake.
I used to trust the main stream media, now I feel like we are all being played. Both sides are being manipulated. I hope that we aren't manipulated in to a war.
Has anyone heard that there is a Russian Spy boat 30 miles from Groton CT?
I used to trust the main stream media, now I feel like we are all being played. Both sides are being manipulated. I hope that we aren't manipulated in to a war.
Has anyone heard that there is a Russian Spy boat 30 miles from Groton CT?
1 Comments
Yes Dee and it is true, it has been loitering up and down the east coast for about a week.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russian-spy-ship-patrolling-off-u-s-east-coast/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/02/15/russian-spy-ship-spotted-near-us/97939010/
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russian-spy-ship-patrolling-off-u-s-east-coast/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/02/15/russian-spy-ship-spotted-near-us/97939010/
Prime example #3
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/Current-Events---/Trump-Refuses-to-Provide-California-Federal-Support-in-Midst-of-Natural-Disaster/show/2958996
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/Current-Events---/Trump-Refuses-to-Provide-California-Federal-Support-in-Midst-of-Natural-Disaster/show/2958996
1 Comments
People are anxious to pit one side against the other, so stories get passed along without checking sources to make sure they're credible or that the stories are true.
That same Stanford study said: "Drawing on audience data, archives of fact-checking websites,and results from a new online survey, we find: (i) social media was an important but not dominant source of news in the run-up to the election"
https://web.stanford.edu/~gentzkow/research/fakenews.pdf
Clinton lost the election all by herself by declaring a good share of the population "deplorable". She and/or her campaign thought they didn't have to bother with certain areas because Obama carried them, so they assumed she would too. She didn't...
That said, I don't believe the government should determine what's fake and what's real when it comes to news. Just taking a look at our current administration, we can see that a good share of the news would be determined to be fake, if not found to be "acceptable".
It's up to the population to ferret out the fake stories... I, personally, try to make a point of checking websites to determine whether they're credible or not. Many times over the course, of the campaign, I posted on stories that they were fake and I saw people sharing them anyway.
It's also up to the news sources to make sure they report the news accurately. Too often, they add their own spin to things, which ultimately, does turn an incident or article into something bordering on "fake" or false... While drama sells, news outlets should report the news the way it happened and save the extra commentary, or dramatic intonations, for shows designated for that purpose.
https://web.stanford.edu/~gentzkow/research/fakenews.pdf
Clinton lost the election all by herself by declaring a good share of the population "deplorable". She and/or her campaign thought they didn't have to bother with certain areas because Obama carried them, so they assumed she would too. She didn't...
That said, I don't believe the government should determine what's fake and what's real when it comes to news. Just taking a look at our current administration, we can see that a good share of the news would be determined to be fake, if not found to be "acceptable".
It's up to the population to ferret out the fake stories... I, personally, try to make a point of checking websites to determine whether they're credible or not. Many times over the course, of the campaign, I posted on stories that they were fake and I saw people sharing them anyway.
It's also up to the news sources to make sure they report the news accurately. Too often, they add their own spin to things, which ultimately, does turn an incident or article into something bordering on "fake" or false... While drama sells, news outlets should report the news the way it happened and save the extra commentary, or dramatic intonations, for shows designated for that purpose.
1 Comments
Accuracy is always going to come into question and you have to consider the source. I can't think of one consistently unbiased news source out there. They all appear to be agenda driven and the facts are always muddied with opinion.
Its pitiful and social media just keeps breeding it. More complaints, more fake news sources.
The New York Times, one of the nations "trusted news sources" has on a few occasions has posted the same photograph with conflicting stories.... It's dishonest and the sources position on nearly everything should be questioned. And this isn't just the NWT, its any source that contributes to this garbage.
Its pitiful and social media just keeps breeding it. More complaints, more fake news sources.
The New York Times, one of the nations "trusted news sources" has on a few occasions has posted the same photograph with conflicting stories.... It's dishonest and the sources position on nearly everything should be questioned. And this isn't just the NWT, its any source that contributes to this garbage.
2 prime examples
Johns Hopkins’ Top Psychologist Releases Terrifying Diagnosis of President Trump
http://usuncut.com/politics/top-psychologist-just-diagnosed-trump-mental-disorder/
And then some say he is illiterate, can't even read ! And this is the guy signing laws ! Really, he is not fit, mentally to be president.
https://www.datalounge.com/thread/18362755-donald-trump-is-effectively-illiterate-
Have a great day
Johns Hopkins’ Top Psychologist Releases Terrifying Diagnosis of President Trump
http://usuncut.com/politics/top-psychologist-just-diagnosed-trump-mental-disorder/
And then some say he is illiterate, can't even read ! And this is the guy signing laws ! Really, he is not fit, mentally to be president.
https://www.datalounge.com/thread/18362755-donald-trump-is-effectively-illiterate-
Have a great day
You must join this user group in order to participate in this discussion.
You are reading content posted in the Current Events . . . Group
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.
STIs are the most common cause of genital sores.
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
