Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
163305 tn?1333668571

New 9/11 truth documentary among 'most watched' on PBS this week

"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy.
PBS is the first major network to air the program.

Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among "most watched" documentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared."
Available for free online August 18th - September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. [Update: PBS has extended viewing indefinitely.]
Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.

An earlier report on Digital Journal found that the claims made in the documentary can be verified by reading the government reports themselves. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the government agency charged with the investigation, did not provide any data -- no measurements or estimates -- of the mass or energy that would be required to bring down the buildings in about ten seconds. Normally a scientific report would present all the data that is used to construct a theory. The omission of data is a red flag to anyone familiar with scientific procedure. It appears that the investigators may have intentionally produced reports that the scientific community would reject.

According to the experts appearing in Explosive Evidence, the scientific community did reject the reports immediately, but it has taken a very long time for this message to reach the public. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the producers of the documentary, have been trying to educate the public for a number of years. The PBS broadcast of their work represents a major step forward for them.

While most people have probably heard that a scientific investigation has been conducted and that the building collapses were explained, few have probably looked at the NIST reports themselves. Links to the NIST reports can be found in the above mentioned Digital Journal article. NIST provides no data whatsoever on the actual collapse sequence itself.

The new attention to the issue could be significant for the U.S. presidential election. Prior to the publication of the reports in 2005 and 2008, almost half the population was suspicious of the official story of 9/11, according to several opinion polls. Since then the 9/11 tragedy has been used to direct the policies that have led to the enormous increases in military spending and to a loss of civil liberties in the U.S. and worldwide.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/332051#ixzz25qFo0vu0
109 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
Avatar universal
desrt: That article is junk, I already explained about the PDB. It was not repeated warnings. It was an over view of intelligence.
Helpful - 0
148588 tn?1465778809
I have no opinion or theories  on Sept. 11 other than it was a terrible waste of human life and it changed the world forever.

If you're looking for conspiracies, the simplest explanation is most likely the truest. Allowing 19 men carrying box cutters to walk onto airplanes is much simpler than planted charges and elaborate conspiracies.

http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/cia-documents-confirm-that-bush-administration-ignored-repeated-warnings-about-osama-bin-laden-attack-plans?news=844661
Helpful - 0
973741 tn?1342342773
ha, I think that is the fist time I wrote a word that got censored.  Let me rephrase things . . . "kitty cats".  
Helpful - 0
973741 tn?1342342773
Well, I'm so dull . . .  it would probably add some excitement to my life to think someone was peaking in on me.
Helpful - 0
163305 tn?1333668571
I really don't like the so-called security measures because they are more show than substance. They slow things down, are a big hassle and intelligent people who wanted to get away with something, still could.

I don't mind the metal detector but enough is enough.

However, it is the loss of our privacy and rights that are truly disturbing. See my other post.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
I cannot imagine people are actually complaining about that? I traveled to Israel and back, there is no way I wouldn't want to be scrutinized. It is a safety measure. We can say it is a loss of privacy but is anyone really going to complain? That seems very strange to me.
It is the legal suspension of rights under the Patriot Act that is seriously inconvenient.
Helpful - 0
You must join this user group in order to participate in this discussion.

You are reading content posted in the Current Events . . . Group

Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.
STIs are the most common cause of genital sores.
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.