Sorry to bother you, but I a question about some scalp (apparently standard-issue epidermal) cysts. I had two develop a few years ago. One doesn't really bother me, it's pretty small and innocuous, but the other is in a rather prominent area where the hair is particularly thin (not related to the cysts), and it has gotten somewhat larger over the past year.
The doctors at my HMO advised me that either I should get used to it, or go in for full surgical excision. I attempted to pursue surgery, in spite of the scarring potential, I figured it wouldn't be any worse than the cyst, which is pretty noticable on its own. The problem is, when I actually went in for the surgery, I was told that scarring on the scalp would be substantially worse than on elsewhere on the body, due to the toughness of the skin (which would require a different kind of stitches used on the scalp) and the presence of hair follicles. I was a little perturbed by this (not least because I was not told anything like that when I had consulted with the surgeon until the day when the procedure was supposed to have taken place,) and put off the procedure.
Sorry about the exposition, but it leads up to several questions I had about this. Firstly, will the scarring on the scalp be substantially worse than elsewhere on the body if I have the procedure done? Secondly, are there any treatment options for removal other than full surgical excision? I've read of a few other treatments in what seemed to be credible sources, involving such processes as minimal excision technique, which might reduce the scarring due to stitches. I scheduled a later appointment with the same surgeon to ask him about these; he said he didn't know anything about it, and said I had likely misinterpreted something on draining cysts (I went back to the article, and I'm certainly not a doctor, but it seems to be a distinct procedure from drainage.) Anyhow, after talking to the surgeon, they referred me back to a regular dermatologist to discuss these options. Given the options I was given the first time around, I'm not terribly optimistic. I'd just like to note I was not demanding any particular procedure when dealing with the HMO physicians; my primary goal, which I told them, was to be able to make an informed decision, whether or not it the procedure was covered. Finally, if it's not covered, and if it can't be answered on this site, that's fine, what is the general price range for the procedures?
This whole thing has been extremely frustrating for me. Sorry, I'm normally not skeptical of doctors, but I really do feel like I've been getting the runaround on this from my HMO. I would deeply appreciate some independent opinion on the risks and options on my case, thanks. I know its not exactly a huge issue, but it really has bothered me for awhile. Thanks.