Hi, last August I went to a public health clinic to get STD tests. I asked the nurse to look at two fleshy growths around the head of my penis that had been there for several years and was told they were genetial warts. I was devastaed but then she said the only way to know for sure was to have a dermatologist look at them. Luckily I had a dermatologist appointment a week later. A little background on me is that I get skin tags almost EVERYWHERE on my body and am currently battling a weight problem (I've read obesity can cause the growth of skin tags. Also 11 years ago I had some excess skin removed from my penis (It wasn't a full circumcision). There was a scar that left and not all of the skin removed (I read this could cause them as well). The growths are almost exactly where the incision are and have been there for several years. Anyways a week later a went to the dermatologist and he looked at both under microscope. He said he was 99% sure they WEREN'T warts but indeed skin tags and said the 100% sure was to biopsy it. But he said w/my history of tags and the fact they weren't around the shaft then he was positive they were tags. He advised me not to remove them because of the area they were in and the discomfort they caused. My question are tags often misdiagnosed as warts? And do warts moble and move around like these tags can? It was a traumatizing experience for me and I'm still a little angry and confused about it. Should I go ahead and leave to tags alone or get another opinion? They don't hurt and have been there for several years and aren't visible unless I stretch the excess skin on my penis. I'm also afraid that she marked that I had warts in my file since this is a public health clinic. My dermatologist was pretty reassuring but still the 1% question still lingers in my mind.
Certainty in medicine, as elsewhere, is hard to get. Still, I think that opinion by your dermatologist who looked carefully sounds quite reasonable in view of your history and what you describe the doctor found. I don't think a biopsy is needed. As to the record at the STD clinic, it probably won't cause problems for you in the future, but it wouldn't be out of order for you to write them and enclose a copy of your dermatologist's opinion, requesting that they insert it in the record and note its implications with a note of their own.
Copyright 1994-2018MedHelp.All rights reserved. MedHelp is a division of Vitals Consumer Services, LLC.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.