Hello,
After a car accident in 2004 I had dizziness and was found to have suffered vestibular nerve damage. I went through the rehab and the symptoms improved greatly but 4 years later decided to have a second opinion. They mentioned that there could be ocular symptoms also that prevented 100% recovery and therefore went to an ophthamologist for a field vision test and eye exam.
My field vision and vision test were normal, except that I do have some distorted vision in my right eye which I noticed after the accident but never knew how to describe it until I looked at an amsler grid.
When I had my eyes looked at, the doctor said that everything was fine, but he noticed spots on my retina but that these were quite common in people with blue eyes. He said that if I was older (I was 38 at the time), he would check more to make sure that it wasn't MD, but he was not concerned. At that point I did not have a word for my weird vision or I would have mentioned my distortion.
The next day I looked up MD and an amsler grid and realised that I had distorted vision and go very scared. I called the hospital and due to my concern they had me come in that day (the doctor was not there).
They gave me a full retina scan in both eyes, and also took photographs and told me that my retinas were completely normal and healthy.
I do believe that the distortion is from the accident as I first noticed it shortly after during a basic eye exam, and also during the summer following. However now I am concerned about what the spots were.
As he mentioned that many blue-eyed people have them, was he referring to 'eye freckles'? If there was any evidence of anything else, including chorioretinitis, would they have known the difference when looking at the scans and photographs?
I am now worried about what the doctor may have been missing.
Thank you.