Aa
Cataracts, Alternative Treatment
There is an article by Dr. Jonathan V. Wright in the July 2008 edition of Nutrition and Healing that discusses a trial of n-acetyl-carnosine eye drops for the treatment of cataracts. Using two drops a day, in six months 90 per cent of the treated eyes showed improvement, as high as 100 per cent.
I did not know of this article when I started using the drops in November 2009. For the first six months I only used one drop a day. When I saw improvement I went to the standard treatment of 2 drops a day. By November 2010 (exactly one year later) my left eye improved 100 per cent and my right eye almost that much. I am still under treatment. My progress is documented by my retina MD. I will be tested again this coming May. There are no side effects.
Before I started the treatment I was told I needed cataract surgery. I am now told that I do not.
I did not know of this article when I started using the drops in November 2009. For the first six months I only used one drop a day. When I saw improvement I went to the standard treatment of 2 drops a day. By November 2010 (exactly one year later) my left eye improved 100 per cent and my right eye almost that much. I am still under treatment. My progress is documented by my retina MD. I will be tested again this coming May. There are no side effects.
Before I started the treatment I was told I needed cataract surgery. I am now told that I do not.
If I were to ask how many pills of vitamin C were sold, could you tell me? If I were to ask how many people suffering from sluggish gallbladder were cured could you tell me?
My question is simple: How many patients were treated with NAC oe similar drops? If this can;t be answered, I 'm asking : How many pils have been sold world-wide? How many cures are reported world wide? This is the only way to decide on effectiveness.
It has been a bad year. And a good year. That is to say that I am still alive and more so every day. After the accident my sight seemed to have worsened somewhat, which was discouraging. This past March 19th I started using the drops again, after a lapse of 10 months. As before my sight is improving very slowly, but in this case I start without a baseline since I did not have my eyes retested before resuming treatment. I shall probably wait until September to be retested.
Interesting post. From my own experience, and this is verified by a retinal MD, my cataracts have regressed over a one-year period to the point where I no longer need surgery. I question curing cataracts in three or six months. This has not been my experience and I am a very compliant person. It may be possible that the cataracts treated were in the very early stages. That would make sense.
I was to make another report on my progress at the end of May. Unfortunately, in early May I had a terrible accident and was hospitalized for a month and then in rehab for a another month. I just got back home a few days ago. I have not been treating my eyes and have not seen the retina MD. The reason I have not been using the drops is that one of my medications would interfere with it.
Having said that, once I am on my feet again and free of the problematic medication, I will resume the treatment of my eyes.
It doesn't matter to me that people may cry "Bah! Humbug!" I am not seeking approval. But this is certain. My sight has improved dramatically, and my doctors do not cry "Bah! Humbug!"
I was to make another report on my progress at the end of May. Unfortunately, in early May I had a terrible accident and was hospitalized for a month and then in rehab for a another month. I just got back home a few days ago. I have not been treating my eyes and have not seen the retina MD. The reason I have not been using the drops is that one of my medications would interfere with it.
Having said that, once I am on my feet again and free of the problematic medication, I will resume the treatment of my eyes.
It doesn't matter to me that people may cry "Bah! Humbug!" I am not seeking approval. But this is certain. My sight has improved dramatically, and my doctors do not cry "Bah! Humbug!"
I'm very happy for the results that allmymarbles has experienced. I hope the treatment continues to go well
Having said that, I have seen articles and ads about n-carnosine that date back to 2004. If this were the be-all and end-all non-surgical cure for cataracts, I have to think almost everybody would be using it. To the best of my knowledge there remains only one real treatment for cataracts, and that is surgical removal.
Having said that, I have seen articles and ads about n-carnosine that date back to 2004. If this were the be-all and end-all non-surgical cure for cataracts, I have to think almost everybody would be using it. To the best of my knowledge there remains only one real treatment for cataracts, and that is surgical removal.
I developed cataracts 6 years ago at a early age. Not believing that there could be no natural cure, I researched and researched and finally decided to try the n-acetyl-carnosine drops. I took them as directed, and in the end, they did absolutely nothing except lighten my wallet.
I am really shocked to find the deliberate disinformation that you are being subjected to. Cataracts can be healed. From a Daily Mail article wisely displayed by a website selling a carnosine cure, you find that Prof. Steven Gallant, a biochemist at London's Bart Hospital, has informed the journalist that the success rates in clearing cataracts using this method is almost 100 per cent over a three to six-month period.
I say wisely because although newspapers are not always accurate, an astute reader can usually work out what is reliable, and it is plain and obvious that this is a reliable and very well written article.
I say wisely because although newspapers are not always accurate, an astute reader can usually work out what is reliable, and it is plain and obvious that this is a reliable and very well written article.
It was the trial I was interested in and I know nothing at all about Dr. Wright. The trial struck me because it mirrored my experience.
There were other improvements with the treatment that I did not mention. I have had arcus senilis for 20 years. The rings have now darkened and narrowed. In my right eye it now looks mottled. My guess is that the deposit has become less dense and my natural eye color (dark brown, almost black) is showing through.
I also have macular degeneration in my left eye. The Amsler Grid shows some bulging, but there are no blank spots. Whereas I could not read through the gray cloud, now I can, so there is some minor improvement. It is easier to judge the progress with my right eye (normal Amsler Grid) which originally had three smallish dark clumps of drusen and scattered bits. Now there is one palish clump and almost no scattering. I meant to ask the retina MD about this, but was so surprised when told I did not need surgery that everything else fell out of my head. I will ask in May.
As per your request, I will post developments.
There were other improvements with the treatment that I did not mention. I have had arcus senilis for 20 years. The rings have now darkened and narrowed. In my right eye it now looks mottled. My guess is that the deposit has become less dense and my natural eye color (dark brown, almost black) is showing through.
I also have macular degeneration in my left eye. The Amsler Grid shows some bulging, but there are no blank spots. Whereas I could not read through the gray cloud, now I can, so there is some minor improvement. It is easier to judge the progress with my right eye (normal Amsler Grid) which originally had three smallish dark clumps of drusen and scattered bits. Now there is one palish clump and almost no scattering. I meant to ask the retina MD about this, but was so surprised when told I did not need surgery that everything else fell out of my head. I will ask in May.
As per your request, I will post developments.
I'm glad that you've found a cataract treatment that works for you.
Wikipedia reports that Dr. Wright also advocates a triple-estrogen hormone replacement therapy formula, which he apparently sells. His formula is based on his study of a small number of women for a short time, with no followup studies about its long-term effectiveness or safety. Basing medical treatment on this type of research makes me VERY nervous, and there's no way that I would consider trying this formula myself.
Please keep us posted on how you're doing with n-acetyl carnosine.
Wikipedia reports that Dr. Wright also advocates a triple-estrogen hormone replacement therapy formula, which he apparently sells. His formula is based on his study of a small number of women for a short time, with no followup studies about its long-term effectiveness or safety. Basing medical treatment on this type of research makes me VERY nervous, and there's no way that I would consider trying this formula myself.
Please keep us posted on how you're doing with n-acetyl carnosine.
There are not many trials (at least not in the U.S.) for the carnosine drops, but the few that I have found showed favorable results. I also keep in mind that when people participate in studies of this type there is no way to measure compliance, so results are more apt to be better than they appear, rather than worse. I am extremely compliant which may be one of the reasons my results have been so good.
What can I say? Here I am with much improved eyesight. I have gotten to the stage where I can read, with difficulty, normal type without glasses. I can't even remember when I was last able to do that. There are not many trials, and certainly not large ones, for alternative medicine remedies (and I consider "alternative" a misnomer). As you and I know it is because there is no money to fund them. So people do as I do. We try them out if they seem reasonable. I hit it lucky. And not for the first time.
And as for being a co-founder of the American Quack Association (which I didn't know), think tongue-in-cheek. Alternative MD's are often called quacks, aren't they?
And as for being a co-founder of the American Quack Association (which I didn't know), think tongue-in-cheek. Alternative MD's are often called quacks, aren't they?
I spent a little time researching the Nutrition and Healing journal. It seems that all the articles in this journal are written by Dr. Wright, who is also the president and cofounder of the American Quack Association. This does not contribute to my confidence in the efficacy of n-acetyl carnosine eye drops for treating cataracts.
I see that my reply has been removed. I should this would be in contravention to MedHelp policy. So I shall relist it.
You can be as emphatic as you like but YOU ARE WRONG. At least in my case you are wrong. How else can you explain an improvement in my left eye from 20/100 to 20/50, and in my right eye from 20/70 to 20/40, in exactly one year, as documented by a retina MD? Spontaneous remission? The placebo effect? A miracle? A misdiagnosis?
About 15 years ago I was told I had incipient cataracts. I don't believe in miracles. As for the placebo effect, wishing will make it so? I guess we can settle on spontaneous remission, a catchall for cures by alternative medicine that cannot be explained by traditionalists.
About three years ago I first tested the carnosine drops (which are used in Europe for treatment of cataracts) for efficacy by using them in only one eye. I detected changes and after one month I added them to the other eye. The same changes. (Early changes had to do with intensity of color.) I did not pursue the treatment at that time. Over time my eyesight worsened and I had tests taken in November 2009. I was told I needed cataract surgery. I remembered what our old family doctor (my uncle actually) said, "Surgery is the last resort, after you have tried everything else." I followed his dictum and am glad I did.
People who involve themselves in alternative therapies are considered by the traditional medical community to be innocent dupes. I am hardly that. In fact I am an experienced and dogged researcher who was at one time a medical editor. I never feared cataract surgery and had, with your sound advice, already chosen the lenses I wanted. One of my brothers and one of my sisters had already had cataract surgery with very fine results.
I have followed this forum for quite some time and am impressed with the quality of information and help. I have learned a great deal about eye conditions and treatments, and for that I thank you and Dr. Oyakawa. But I am sorry to say that you have a blind spot when it comes to treatments that you have not personally tested or employed.
About 15 years ago I was told I had incipient cataracts. I don't believe in miracles. As for the placebo effect, wishing will make it so? I guess we can settle on spontaneous remission, a catchall for cures by alternative medicine that cannot be explained by traditionalists.
About three years ago I first tested the carnosine drops (which are used in Europe for treatment of cataracts) for efficacy by using them in only one eye. I detected changes and after one month I added them to the other eye. The same changes. (Early changes had to do with intensity of color.) I did not pursue the treatment at that time. Over time my eyesight worsened and I had tests taken in November 2009. I was told I needed cataract surgery. I remembered what our old family doctor (my uncle actually) said, "Surgery is the last resort, after you have tried everything else." I followed his dictum and am glad I did.
People who involve themselves in alternative therapies are considered by the traditional medical community to be innocent dupes. I am hardly that. In fact I am an experienced and dogged researcher who was at one time a medical editor. I never feared cataract surgery and had, with your sound advice, already chosen the lenses I wanted. One of my brothers and one of my sisters had already had cataract surgery with very fine results.
I have followed this forum for quite some time and am impressed with the quality of information and help. I have learned a great deal about eye conditions and treatments, and for that I thank you and Dr. Oyakawa. But I am sorry to say that you have a blind spot when it comes to treatments that you have not personally tested or employed.
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
There are some eye drops under legitimate study that show promise of slowing down the progression of cataracts BUT N ACETYL CARNOSINE IS NOT ONE OF THEM. There is a well organized promotional machine on the internet that promotes this "miracle product". Almost none of it is legtimate and is overwhelming geared to selling the stuff on the internet.
JCH MD
JCH MD
Have an Answer?
You are reading content posted in the Eye Care Community
Top General Health Answerers
Kansas City, MO
Grand Prairie, TX
San Diego, CA
Discharge often isn't normal, and could mean an infection or an STD.
In this unique and fascinating report from Missouri Medicine, world-renowned expert Dr. Raymond Moody examines what really happens when we almost die.
Think a loved one may be experiencing hearing loss? Here are five warning signs to watch for.
When it comes to your health, timing is everything
We’ve got a crash course on metabolism basics.
Learn what you can do to avoid ski injury and other common winter sports injury.
Would you please list those that are legitimate? Would you please list your source of information that N ACETYL CARNOSINE will not slow down the progression of cataracts?