Success with any of these IOLs depends on the skill of your doctor and the condition of your eyes.
Dr. O.
Jean, I am one of the apparently rare reStor success stories. I see clearly up close as well as evenly into the far distance. However--and I emphasize this--my eyes had certain qualities that made me an excellent candidate for this lens, according to my doc. For one thing, I have always been 'far sighted'; that is, my eyeballs front to back are 'short.' For another, I had no astigmatism. For another, my pupils were a good size for this model reStor (the D-1). And finally, I did not necessarily expect to be among the ten or fifteen percent who never need corrective lenses after the surgery. Frankly, my vision had become so cr*ppy that ANYTHING would have been an improvement, but to my amazement, I don't use reading lenses except extremely rarely when the ambient light is very, very low.
I would suggest you quiz your doctor--or maybe even several doctors--about the likelihood that the combination of your eyes and this lens would give you the result you need.
I am not a tennis player, but I would stay away from Restor. There is a lot of information on this forum regarding them. Check the archives. I had the Restor in one eye and had it explanted and exchanged for a monofocal. Both eye are monofocal with mini monovision.
I just need glasses for very tiny print, but I would gladly wear progressive glasses if it was necessary rather than the problem causing Restor. By the way, I am 68 years old.
Good luck in Nationals!