to me a biopsy seems very dangerous, I've never had it done but heard about it and the tought of knowing that all kinds of needles will first have to penetrate through the colon to get to the prostate already calls for an infection, and much worst if it is determined that there are no signs of prostate cancer now you are at a risk of developing some sort of new disease simply for going through that process, to me this way of determining prostate cancer is too risky, it's obsolete and the method of detecting prostate cancer should be modernized to a more safe way of finding out, sorry but I just wouldn't do it or will do it otherwise
Adam, how were you diagnosed a year and a half ago? What tests were run?