y the way Dr. J called the guy who i hadf this exposure with and he assured me me is HIV- and he even e-mailed his lab results of all STD's including HIV and he was negative, he was tested on October. He hasn't been with anyone other than with his boyfriend who he tested with and been together for 6 months and me...
No. I would not recommend or even consider PEP for an exposure of this sort. It would be a waste of money and the frequency of drug side effects with PEP is high. EWH
Its been less than 72 hrs after the exposure, should I get PEP?
The first part of your question is easy to answer, yes, you were protected by the condom. At the same time, I find myself wondering why it only covered a portion of the penis. If it was not fully in place because it was not put on fully, you are asking for trouble in the future if you continue to do this (it will be more likely to come off). On the other hand, if it was on completely but did not cover the entire penis, no problem.
There is no perfect answer to your second question which can be restated as “When does pressure, which is required for penetration, lead to penetration?” I doubt that you are perfectly able to answer that question and I am sure I cannot. Remember, the friction component which makes sex a good thing is also part of the reason there is risk (the friction creates tiny, invisible tears). If you felt the pressure and even a little discomfort there was some small amount of trauma as well. Thus was there some risk? yes. How much? Unknown but probably not much.
To be honest, I am sure that you have little to worry about. he said he was negative so he probably was (most people tell the truth), you used a condom, etc. Having said all of this, given your description can I promise you there was NO risk whatsoever - no, I can't do that either. Should you get tested yes. I am confident that your risk is low and that your result will be negative but the test (at around 6 weeks) will make you absolutely sure. Take Care. EWH