Your questions have now deteriorated to the stage of "what if..." This wil be the last answer. Still no risk. EWH
Thank you. One more thing and then I promise I'll stop! So even if you knew for a fact that it was HIV+ blood on the gloves from only 10 seconds before touching my wound, would you still consider this "no risk"? Thanks again!
Both = gloves, inanimate surfaces, clothing, countertops, etc. Any surface outside of the body.
EWH
Sorry can you explain what you mean by "both" in question #2? THanks!!!
1. As I said, not enough for transmission to occur
2. Both, and other environmental surfaces as well. EWH
Thank you for your reassurance. I have a couple quick follow up questions:
1) Wouldn't there still be gaps in my skin that the blood could go into (i.e. the space between the individual stitches)?
2) What do you mean by "HIV does not survive on the surface of such materials more than a few seconds"? Are you referring to the gloves as the material?
Please don't worry about this event. For starters, I sincerely doubt that this was blood on the gloves but instead probably a cleaning material, if anything. Second, if it was blood, it was unlikely to be from someone who had HIV. Third, and most importantly, even if it was blood from a person with HIV, HIV is not transmitted with this sort of surface contact. Your wound had already been stitched close and HIV does not survive on the surface of such materials more than a few seconds. There are no reports of HIV being transmitted through an exposure of the sort you describe.
This was a no risk event. Please do not worry. There is no risk involved and no need for testing. EWH