No, repeated exposures would have no impact on the accuracy of your test results. EWH
Thank you for your very speedy and helpful reply.
I had several exposures to the same person, as we were in a relationship. However, my latest exposure was in September 2011.
Would the fact that it was a repeated exposure change your assessment in any way?
Just clarifying as you based your response off my single exposure (which is my fault,I should have mentioned that it was multiple exposures)
I'm sorry that your concerns about the exposure in 2011 you mention are lingering. From what you say this was not a particularly high risk exposure. It was a single exposure to a person who might have, but probably didn't have HIV (even among exclusively men who have sex with only other men, only about 8-10% have HIV and your partner's risk sounds to be lower than that). More importantly, you were tested not once but twice at times when the results would be conclusive. It is now time for you to believe them and stop worrying and/or beating yourself up over this exposure- you were not infected.
Also, even if your viral illness were precisely like the ARS, only 1% of persons with the ARS-like symptoms turn out to have HIV. In your case, the illness occurred long beyond when the ARS would have occurred. And ,in case you have been on the internet- the concept of "late seroconversion" is an internet-fueled myth that does not exist.
As Dr. Handsfield suggested, it is time for you to believe you test results and move forward. You did not get HIV from your exposure of concern. If you cannot get this off you mind, then I would urge you to talk this through with a counselor and address the things that hinder your accepting your test results.
I hope my comments help. EWH
The rash also appeared to go away after treatment with antihistimines if that changes your evaluation.
Whether they are related or it was just a cooincidence, I don't know.