HIV - Prevention Forum
This expert forum is not accepting new questions. Please post your question in one of our medical support communities.
Avatar universal

Symptoms with Negative test.

Hello Doctor,
Thank you for the continuous support on this community. Situation happened about a month ago on Oct 31st.Went to a massage parlor and finally the girl (Asian with few Pimples on face) gave a happy ending to me. Lasted for about a minute after a hours massage. Touched her privates for a few seconds . Went home and checked and what looked like a figure nail cut on the thigh close to the groin which looked red like a bruise but was not bleeding at that movement. She used lotion to masturbate me and I came. No vaginal fluids. Next day went back and asked her to show her hands if she had lesions on her hand and also got her tested for HIV NAT by PCR Roche Cobas Amplicor FDA Lic#1636 for donor screening (this test can also test for HCV) at Unilab in Ft. lauderdale (Not sure how good the lab is).link found below. She was negative.
A week from then Symptoms
1. Cold and fever  for the past 3 weeks
2.Since thanksgiving weekend - lot of fatigue with continued fever even now.
3. night sweats for 2 days this week.
4.red rash or small red bumps spread out on the chest and neck and slight iching redness on the face specially on the cheeks, eyelids and nose.
5. Had white tongue and ulcerative tongue and roof of the mouth for a week. 2 Weeks after exposure.But no sores in the mouth.
Had a HIV DNA-RT by PCR/HIV 1/O/2 by ICMA with Labcorp not approved by FDA 2 days ago after 5 weeks out and was Negative. Went to the doctor and he suspects infection and took blood to run a battery of Tests except HIV today.

1.Should I worry about HIV?
2.Could this be STD or a Viral Infection?

HIV/HCV NAT (FDA # 1636 Licensed for Donor Screening -Detection of RNA)

HIV NAT by PCR FDA#1636 for donor screening (not sure found on search )

LabCorp # 162100 test HIV DNA-RT by PCR/Antibody 1/O/2  by ICMA not approved by FDA
7 Responses
300980 tn?1194933000

Welcome to the Forum.  first, had you been my patient, I would not have even recommended testing, given the nature of your exposure.  It was no risk for HIV.  That said, I understand that many of our clients want the reassurance of a test result.  Your tests now prove that you did not get HIV from this encounter.

Your symptoms are not due to HIV and are most likely some sort of community acquired, non-STD viral illness.  when persons have symptoms, their NAT tests are uniformly positive and remain so.  Thus the testing you got at 5 weeks absolutely rules out HIV.  

The NAT is not approved for HIV diagnosis and has not been studied for this purpose as it is more expensive than standard tests and has an increased rate of false positives.  In your situation however, the test does rule out the possibility of HIV from the encounter you describe.  

No need for further testing. EWH
Avatar universal
Hi Dr.Edward
To eliminate my confusion. Are NAT and PCR synonyms. Does HIV DNA by PCR and HIV NAT by PCR same.

Have you ever prescribed this test that I took Dr.Edward. Asking since FDA did not approve and the test itself says they do not know the timing. Asking since from your experience did you see this specific test turn positive after 4 weeks for anyone. Due to technicians manually have to see the length of the pro viral DNA and determine. Even ICMA Antibody test is it good for your timeline of 6 to 8 weeks or should I go with Quest who use Elisa in the future

LabCorp the test that I took


Unilab does the specified HIV/HCV NAT by PCR Roche Cobas Amplicor FDA# 1636  (RNA For Donor screening at $100 with ****.com in South Florida-WPB and with doctors order covered by insurance

SED Labs in New Mexico does HIV Combo DUO test and can be found with any www.****.com that takes the blood and ships it to them
300980 tn?1194933000
PCR=NAT=NAAT  These are all the same sorts of tests and, in your circumstance, particularly when combined with the ICMA at any time beyond are to be believed.  You do not need repeat testing.  EWH
Avatar universal
From your comments "The NAT is not approved for HIV diagnosis and has not been studied for this purpose" . It would still find the genetic material of the Virus at 5 weeks if the virus can replicate that soon correct. Asking since I got the impression that it is a test not studied by the FDA that it is reliable like the RNA or DUO test. From doctor Hunters comments above this post http://www.medhelp.org/posts/HIV-Prevention/Hiv-scare-please-advise-/show/1629619 . That "fever and rash" together and which don't seem to go for weeks for me could sound like HIV. I am sure thousands are getting tested with HIV DNA-RT by PCR for diagnosis of HIV including my Infectious diseases doctor that I visited last year prescribed the same test. I hope FDA studies this test sooner as many websites and a lot of folks on the site are taking it.
300980 tn?1194933000
This will be the last answer.  You keep asking the same questions in slightly different ways.  Repeating the question will not change the answer, thus this will be my last answer.

The FACT is that HIV replicates immediately and continuously in infected persons who are not receiving therapy.  Statements like "if it replicates that soon" are biologically incorrect.  

The FDA will not study the test.  Studies for FDA approval must be perfromed by the manufacturers.  I suspect this will not be done

Nothing more to say.  End of thread. EWH
Avatar universal
I will never test with HIV DNA by PCR in the future or any non FDA approved tests.Thank you Dr. Edward. Sorry for getting on your nerves. Prosper well.
Avatar universal
PCR testing explained by a lab technician

Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
These tips can help HIV-positive women live a long, healthy life.
Despite the drop in new infections, black women are still at a high risk for HIV, the virus that causes Aids.
What are your HIV treatment options, and how do you choose the right one? Our panel of experts weighs in.
Learn the truth behind 14 common misconceptions about HIV.
Can HIV be transmitted through this sexual activity? Dr. Jose Gonzalez-Garcia answers this commonly-asked question.
A breakthrough study discovers how to reduce risk of HIV transmission by 95 percent.