Thank you for your reply. That would be good news. All the best.
I believe he might. We have always gone by the FDA, CDC and test manufacture recommendations.
Hi Vance, I see from your older posts you have changed your opinion; concerning the 4th Gen Duo (as has Nursegirl). Do you think the same would go for Teak.
Teak is actually helping on another website currently.
Perhaps I should have said the CDC have since June 2014; updated their guidelines concerning the 4th Gen Duo.
I have just looked at the webpages you have put on your post. This is old information. In fact if you read it. It only mentions the antibody test. It doesn't, mention the Duo test at all! It is true for antibody test it is 3 months. It also says ad for window period it depends on which test you use. Since June 2014 CDC have changed their guidelines concerning the Duo. Your webpage was clearly written before this. If Duo is negative after 28 days (and they clearly say Duo picks up infection quicker than antibody alone test). You do not have to retest again. Guess we will have to agree to disagree.
The CDC have not changed their guidelines on window periods. It may be considered overly conservative by most experts, but 3 months is still what they advise to be absolutely certain.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/testing.html
Why is there little word from Teak since CDC changed guidelines?
You're information is incorrect.
UK testing guidelines.
Post-test discussion
The need for a repeat HIV test if still within the window period after a specific exposure should be discussed. Although fourth generation tests shorten the time from exposure to seroconversion a repeat test at three months is still recommended to definitively exclude HIV infection.
http://www.bhiva.org/documents/Guidelines/Testing/GlinesHIVTest08.pdf